Calculating Altitude Using Barometer and Thermometer Readings

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the height of the mercury column in the barometer, the pressure of steam at 98°C should be determined first, using steam tables if necessary. The relevant equation for pressure at the bottom of a liquid column is p = ρgh, where ρ is the density of the liquid, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the height of the column. After finding the pressure of the steam, rearranging the equation will yield the height of the mercury column. Additionally, to estimate altitude relative to sea level, the density of air can be used in conjunction with the calculated pressure. This approach effectively combines thermodynamic principles with fluid mechanics to solve the problem.
tweety1234
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a)
A scientist carries a thermometer, barometer, pan and gas camping stove up a mountain. At a certain point he collects water from a stream, boils it and measures the temperature of the steam condensing on the thermometer to be 98°C. What is the height of the column of mercury (density = 13560 kg m^{-3} ) in the barometer?

b) Estimate the altitude of the scientist relative to sea level, assuming the density of air to be 1.186 kg m^{-3} .

I am no sure how to do this question? Do I have to use steam tables?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's one of the ways of dealing with the problem.
 
Borek said:
That's one of the ways of dealing with the problem.

okay, how would I go about finding the height of the barometer? do I use this equation \bigtriangleup p = \rho g \bigtriangleup h ?
 
No need for deltas, p=dgh correctly describes pressure at the bottom of the column of a liquid.
 
Borek said:
No need for deltas, p=dgh correctly describes pressure at the bottom of the column of a liquid.

Okay thanks,

So do I just get the pressure of steam at that temperature 98C, and than rearrange the equation to find h ?

Is this the correct method to work out the height of the barometer?
 
Looks like.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top