Calculating Angle of Saturn from Earth Using a Refracting Telescope

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fizzicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics Telescope
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angle Saturn subtends from Earth using a refracting telescope, the formula θ = -y'/f1 is applied, where y' is the image height and f1 is the focal length. The image diameter of 1.7 mm is used as the image height, but confusion arises regarding the application of plate scale and whether to consider half-angle versus full angle. Understanding the plate scale is crucial, as it relates image height to the subtended angle. The plate scale is defined as the image height divided by the angle, which helps in determining the correct angle measurement. Clarification on these concepts is necessary for accurate calculations.
Fizzicist
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Saturn is viewed through the Lick Observatory refracting telescope (objective focal length 18 m). If the diameter of the image produced by the objective is 1.7 mm, what angle does Saturn subtend when viewed from earth?


Homework Equations



\theta = -y'/f1, where \theta is the angle that Saturn subtends when viewed by the unaided eye, y' is the height of the image formed by the objective and f1 is the focal length of the objective.

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the image diameter as the image height (1.7 mm). It did not work. I don't see why that is wrong. Can someone please tell me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly am I supposed to do with this? Use it for the image height? I am confused about what a plate scale is, and how I could use it to find the image height.
 
I guess my question would be, what is the point of finding the plate scale? How does it relate to the image height?
 
The plate scale is the image height/angle.
You know the image height and you want the angle.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top