Calculating Angular Acceleration w/ Torque & Moment of Inertia

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating angular acceleration using torque and moment of inertia, specifically through the formula τ = Iα. Given a torque of 12 kg m²/s² and a moment of inertia of 3.00 kg m², the resulting angular acceleration is calculated as 4 rad/s². The conversation also clarifies the concept of radians as a dimensionless unit that represents angular quantities, emphasizing its role in distinguishing angular measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque (τ) in physics
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia (I)
  • Knowledge of angular acceleration (α) and its units
  • Basic grasp of unit conversion and dimensional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between torque and angular acceleration in rotational dynamics
  • Explore the concept of moment of inertia for various shapes and bodies
  • Learn about the applications of angular acceleration in real-world scenarios
  • Investigate the significance of dimensionless units in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding rotational motion and dynamics.

SDTK
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



this is a question just to help with my understanding: ...

when Torque (kg m^2/s^2) and the Moment of Inertia (kg m^2) are known and used to find angular acceleration, ... T(net)/I, are the units for the resulting acceleration rad/s^2

Thanks :-)

Homework Equations


##\tau = I \alpha##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B] Example:
t = 12 kg m^2/s^2
I = 3.00 kg m^2

angular acceleration = torque/I = 12 kg m^2/s^2 / 3.00 kg m^2 = 4 units(?) / s^2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Angular acceleration is given in radians per second squared ##(rad/s^2)##.

The radian is sort of a "unitless unit" that appears and disappears as required when working with angular quantities. It's based on a ratio of lengths from the unit circle, where an angle is defined via the arclength along the circle divided by the radius length. It serves to distinguish a quantity as being angular in nature.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SDTK
thank you! :-)
 
gneill said:
unitless unit
How about "dimensionless unit"?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SDTK
haruspex said:
How about "dimensionless unit"?
Sure! That's probably better nomenclature. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SDTK

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
938
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K