Calculating Angular Momentum when Radius Changes for 2s

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Radius
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular momentum of a 2.0-kg block that accelerates in two dimensions over 2 seconds. The block's initial position is 3.0 m from the origin, and its acceleration is given as (4.0 m/s²)i + (3.0 m/s²)j. The correct angular momentum at the end of the time period is determined to be (36 kg·m²/s)k. A participant questions why the radius wasn't adjusted during the calculation, as the block moves across the axis while accelerating. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using vector methods for accurate angular momentum calculations.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
26. A 2.0-kg block starts from rest on the positive x-axis 3.0 m from the origin and thereafter has an acceleration given by a = (4.0 m/s2)ˆi (3.0 m/s2)ˆj. At the end of 2.0 s its angular momentum about the origin is:
A. 0
B. (36kg·m2/s)kˆ
C. (+48kg·m2/s)kˆ
D. (96kg·m2/s)kˆ
E. (+96kg·m2/s)kˆ
ans: B

For this question, they essentially did:

L = | r x p |
L = (r)(m)(v)
L = (3m)(2kg)(6m/s) * I calculated v = 6 m/s to be the tangential velocity

Now, I was wondering why they didn't change the radius since it accelerates for 2 seconds. During this time period, it moves across the axis, parallel to the original rotation axis.

Δx = (1/2)(4m/s2)(2s)2 and I added this length to my attempt, but it doesn't seem like the solution did. I was wondering if this is correct or if it's incorrect for future reference...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want comments on the book(?) solution, please post the complete text of that.
But I would have thought the appropriate method here would be a purely vectorial one, which turns out to be very easy.
##\vec {\ddot x} = \vec c##
##\vec { \dot x} = \vec c t + \vec {\dot {x_0}} = \vec c t##
##\vec x = \frac 12 \vec c t^2 + \vec x_0##
##\vec L = m \vec x × \dot {\vec x} = m (\frac 12 \vec c t^2 + \vec x_0)× \vec c t = m \vec x_0 × \vec c t##
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top