Calculating Angular Width of Central Maximum in Wave Diffraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsisfun2005
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Wave Width
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angular width of the central maximum in wave diffraction, the relevant formula is sin(theta) = (n * lambda) / d, where lambda is the wavelength, d is the width of the gap, and n is the order of the minimum. In this case, with a wavelength of 2m and a gap width of 10m, the first-order minimum corresponds to n=1. The discussion clarifies that this is a single gap problem, distinct from a two-slit interference scenario, although the formulas can appear similar. Understanding the distinction helps simplify the calculation of the angular separation from the central maximum to the first-order minimum. The process is confirmed to be easier than initially perceived.
Physicsisfun2005
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Waves with wavelength 2m pass through a hole in a barrier 10m wide. Compute the angular width of the central maximum.

I'm not sure what I am finding here. Is it the angel between the central maximum and the 1st nodal line?...If so am I treating this like a 2 point source problem?

Any help would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a "single gap" problem, but the formula is (sometimes) identical to the 2-slit problem. With a single gap, the angular separation from central maximum to the first-order minimum is given with the formula sin theta = (n lambda) / d .

Here d is the width of the gap and n is the "order" (one in this case).

With 2-slit interference, d is the separation of the slits, and theta gives you the angular position of the first order maximum.
 
ahh thanks...easier than I thought.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
47K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top