I Calculating area of multiple connected circles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the surface area of four identical circles compared to a larger overlayed circle. The circles have a diameter of x, while the overlayed circle has a diameter of 2x + B, where B represents the maximum separation between the circles. The surface area of the four circles is calculated as πx², while the overlayed circle's area is π(x + B/2)². A suggestion is made to use a geometric approach involving the centers of the circles to simplify the calculations. The conversation highlights the potential for alternative methods to solve the problem.
magnetics
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hopefully this is a challenging maths problem for someone. This problem is to compare the surface area of the 4 identical circles with the circle overlayed drawn in pencil.

The attached image shows 4 circles, each with diameter x.
To solve the problem, I need to calculate the maximum separation between the circles represented by the circle B with diameter B.

Once B can be calculated, 2x + B will be the diameter of a single circle overlayed over the four as shown in pencil.

This seems to me to be the simplest method to compare the difference in surface area between the four circles and the overlayed circle
i.e. the four circles -> πx2
and the overlayed circle -> π(x+B/2)2

Or there maybe an easier way I have overlooked??

Thank you.

NOTE:
The surface area of the four circles uses the formula πr2, but where r = x/2 and for four identical circles is 4 x π(x/2)2 which is 4πx2/4 which is πx2

Sorry if I'm not very familiar with using the correct symbols on this platform.
 

Attachments

  • Quas-Array-Device-Comparrison.jpg
    Quas-Array-Device-Comparrison.jpg
    52 KB · Views: 841
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Make a triangle with the centers of two "S" circles and one "N" circle (or vice versa), and you'll find a method that is much easier than area calculations.
 
  • Like
Likes magnetics
Right you are mfb.
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top