Chemistry Calculating Atoms & Molecules in H20 - Is It Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dnt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Molecules
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the number of molecules in 18 g of H2O, which is one mole, you multiply by Avogadro's number (6.022 x 10^23). For atoms in water, since each molecule consists of three atoms (two hydrogen and one oxygen), you multiply the number of molecules by three. If asked specifically for hydrogen atoms, you would take the number of water molecules and multiply by two, as each molecule contains two hydrogen atoms. The discussion clarifies that while there is no standalone "atom of water," understanding the composition of water molecules is crucial for accurate calculations. Therefore, the method for calculating atoms depends on whether the inquiry is about total atoms in water or specifically hydrogen atoms.
dnt
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
say for example, a question states that you have 18 g of H20 which is obviously one mole.

now if they asked how many molecules of water you had, you would just multiply the one mole by avagadros number (6.022 * 10^23) to get that answer.

if they asked how many atoms of water, would it be the same?

now what if they asked how many atoms of hydrogen would be created? would you then take the previous answer and multiply by 2?

is that correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
there's no such thing as an atom of water, but if they asked you how many atoms are in a mole of water, you would take the number of molecules of water and multiply it by 3 to get the atoms.

if they wanted the atoms of hydrogen, then your answer would be correct.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top