Calculating Barrier Penetration with Proton KE & V

zeta101
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I have a question to do but I am a bit confused about one thing. It invloves protons penetrating a barrier. The protons ae quoted to have a KE in the units of eV (which i will have to convert to joules in order to work in SI units). However the barriers height is given in volts. I assumed this height should be in the units of energy so i multiplied the heigh (in volts) by the charge of a proton/electron, however i get a silly answer at the end...

The formula i am using is for the transmission coeff, it involves a sinh squared term, its too complicated to write here, i have seen a website with it but i can't find the link, however i don't think this is the problem...

thanks for any replies
 
Physics news on Phys.org
to clarify the "silly answer" is not to do with the volts expressed as energy but its to do with the question i have to do...
 
zeta,
I'm confused about what is confusing you. It seems that you never explicated your confusion.

You don't have to work in Joules. In fact, it would probably be more convenient to work in eV (as evidenced by the potential being given in V). I will assume that the protons have less energy than the barrier height? So, maybe you're confused by how they get through? I will also assume that the barrier has some finite width? In this case, the protons get through because they are already through to begin with. That is, their wave function exists on the other side of the boundary because it satisfies Schroedinger's eq. that way.

Maybe your confused by getting a negative kinetic energy inside the barrier potential? That's normal.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top