Calculating Cable Car's Speed on Hill Descent - 4122N Braking Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluebear19
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brakes Cable Car
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a cable car descending a hill while considering the braking force and the influence of a counterweight. The braking force required for a constant descent was determined to be 4122 N. When the brakes fail, participants explored using both conservation of energy and kinematic equations to find the car's speed at the bottom of the hill. The correct approach involves summing the masses of both the cable car and counterweight, leading to a net force that results in an acceleration of 1.04 m/s² and a final speed of 28.9 m/s. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying physics principles and understanding the role of gravitational potential and kinetic energy in the problem.
bluebear19
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The 2100kg cable car shown in the figure descends a 200-m-high hill. In addition to its brakes, the cable car controls its speed by pulling an 1840kg counterweight up the other side of the hill. The rolling friction of both the cable car and the counterweight are negligible.

How much braking force does the cable car need to descend at constant speed?

One day the brakes fail just as the cable car leaves the top on its downward journey. What is the runaway car's speed at the bottom of the hill?

Homework Equations



F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I already found the breaking force = 4122N
but my answers for the second question was always wrong
 

Attachments

  • knight_Figure_08_39[1].jpg
    knight_Figure_08_39[1].jpg
    6.3 KB · Views: 640
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Use conservation of energy.

U_g = mg\Delta h

E_k = \frac{1}{2}mv^2
 
Last edited:


So Ug = 4122*200 = 824600?
what does Ug or Ek stand for?

I'm really worried because I have to submit my answer online and if I get it wrong, its not like I can change it. thanks so much for helping!
 


bluebear19 said:
So Ug = 4122*200 = 824600?
No.
what does Ug or Ek stand for?
Gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy.

When considering conservation of energy, be sure to consider both the car and the counterweight.
 


so does Ek = 824600 = .5mv^2
then 824600 = .5(4123/9.8)v^2
and v = 62.6m/s?
i don't know if I'm doing this right at all
 


There are at least two (equivalent) ways to attack this problem. You can use the result from part one to find the net force on the system and then its acceleration. Then you can find the final speed using kinematics.

Or you can use conservation of energy: ΔKE + ΔPE = 0. Start by finding the change in PE of the system. Hint: The car goes down while the counterweight goes up.
 


so if i use the first way and my results from the first part which the net force = 4120N. That's the right answer

then I do F = ma
4120 = (2100sin30 - 1840sin20)a
a = 9.8m/s^2
isnt that the same as g?

so if that's right then I use : V_s^2 = V_0^2 + 2a(delta x)
delta x: sin30 = 200/x
x = 400m
V_s^2 = 0 + 2(9.8)(400)
v = 88.5m/s

i did this and the answer was wrong, can you please tell me what I did wrong, thanks so you much!
 


bluebear19 said:
so if i use the first way and my results from the first part which the net force = 4120N. That's the right answer
OK. If the breaking force is removed, then 4120 N is the net force.

then I do F = ma
4120 = (2100sin30 - 1840sin20)a
m is the mass of the system. Just add the masses.
a = 9.8m/s^2
isnt that the same as g?
Getting a = g should tip you off that something's wrong. :wink:
 


so I don't have to take into account the angles of the slopes at all?

so then 4120 = (2100+?? or - 1840) because isn't the counterweight slowing the car down? so should I add the masses

and then do I use the same kinematics that I used before??
 
  • #10


bluebear19 said:
so I don't have to take into account the angles of the slopes at all?
Not when calculating the total mass.

so then 4120 = (2100+?? or - 1840) because isn't the counterweight slowing the car down? so should I add the masses
The total mass is just the sum of both masses. Just add them.

and then do I use the same kinematics that I used before??
Yes.
 
  • #11


4120 = (2100 + 1840)a
a = 1.04 m/s^2

V_f^2 = 0 + 2(1.04)(400)
V_f = 28.9m/s

so the 400 m is right?
and would the final velocity be negative since its going downhill?
 
  • #12


nevermind I got it thank you sooooo much
 
Back
Top