Calculating Capacitance for Pulsed Nitrogen Laser Design: Tips and Tricks

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrolliOlli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the capacitance needed for a pulsed nitrogen laser, the energy requirement per pulse is 96 J. The breakdown voltage of air, approximately 3 million volts per meter, is essential for determining the voltage across the spark gap of 0.93 cm. Using the formula for potential energy, U = 1/2 CV², the capacitance can be derived once the voltage is known. After ionization, the resistance in the spark gap decreases significantly, allowing the capacitor's energy to discharge effectively. Understanding these parameters is crucial for successful laser design.
TrolliOlli
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are part of an engineering research team that is designing a pulsed nitrogen laser. To create the high energy densities needed to operate such a laser, the electrical discharge from a high-voltage capacitor is used. Typically, the energy requirement per pulse (i.e., per discharge) is 96 J. Estimate the capacitance required if the discharge is to create a spark across a gap of about 0.93 cm. Assume that the dielectric breakdown of nitrogen is the same as the value for normal air.

I honestly am completely lost.

I know C = Q/V = Q/Ed and also the potential energy U = 1/2 CV^2 but I don't know what I can do with the variables I'm given to get either V or E.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This brings me back - I built a nitrogen laser in 1975 and used it's UV pulses to stimulate an experimental dye laser.

A high voltage is required to ionize the air in the spark gap; you'll need to look that up, perhaps in Wikipedia. Once it is ionized, the resistance is quite low and you can assume all the energy in the capacitor goes into the discharge. So your U = 1/2 CV² will do the job once you know the voltage required.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top