Calculating charge on capacitor.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Charge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the charge (Q) on a capacitor using surface charge density (σs). It is proposed that if σs is uniform across a conductor, the charge can be calculated as Q = σs[(pi)(a^2)], where 'a' is the radius. However, it is noted that in practical scenarios, such as with a finite conducting plate, the surface charge density may not be uniform due to charge repulsion, leading to higher density at the edges. Additionally, the presence of a dielectric with a radially dependent constant complicates the charge distribution, making it non-uniform. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate charge calculations on capacitors.
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
The problem and solution are in the document.

My question is in regards to the solution about calculating the charge on the capacitor. Would an equally correct solution for the charge be...
Let σs be the surface charge density on the plate.
The plate is a conductor and I would assume that the thickness throughout the plate is uniform, and there should be no divots or anything that would create the charge density in some area of the plate to be greater than another area of the plate.

Thus σs is uniform.

Therefore Q = ∫sσsds = σs[∫sds] =
σs[(pi)(a2)] where a is the radius of the circular capacitor.
(ds is obviously a differential surface area of the capacitor)

FINAL: Charge of capacitor (Q) = σs[(pi)(a2)]
 

Attachments

  • CHARGE.jpg
    CHARGE.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 451
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes - if you know the surface charge density.

In the attachment problem, you don't know the surface charge density.

For a finite conducting plate, the surface charge density will not, generally, be uniform: like charges repel so there may be a higher charge density towards the outer edges of the plate. In the attachment problem, the dielectric has a radially dependent constant - so the charge distribution is certainly not uniform (as E is not uniform).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top