Calculating charge transferred between metal spheres

AI Thread Summary
Two metal spheres, one large (1 meter radius) and one small (1 cm radius), are charged to 100V, resulting in a calculated charge of 4µϵ coulombs on the small sphere. When the spheres touch, charge flows until the voltage equalizes, leading to a final voltage of 0.99V on the large sphere and 0.0099*4µϵ coulombs on the small sphere. If the small sphere is lowered into a drilled hole in the large sphere, it discharges completely due to the lack of an electrostatic field inside, raising questions about charge conservation and voltage differences upon separation. The discussion concludes that while charge is conserved, voltage is not, as mechanical energy is exchanged when the spheres are separated. This highlights the complexities of electrostatics in conductive systems.
adaviel
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have two metal spheres, radius 1 metre and 1 cm.
I charge the small one to 100V.
The self-capacitance of the sphere is 4µϵR, so the charge Q = CV = 4µϵ coulombs
Then I touch the two spheres together. I assume charge flows between them so that the voltage equalizes. As charge builds on the surface of the large sphere, electrostatic forces increase which prevent further charge from being transferred. Charge is conserved, I know the capacitance of both, so I get a final voltage of 0.99V and a charge of 0.99*4µϵ coulombs on the large sphere and 0.0099*4µϵ coulombs on the small one (to 2 places).
If I move them apart, that's what they will have. I think.

If instead I drill a 3cm hole in the large sphere, and lower the small one through so it touches the inside of the large sphere, the charge on the small one discharges to the large one. There is no charge on the inside of the large sphere, because it immediately migrates to the outside, and there is no electrostatic field on the inside to prevent more charge being transferred. Does the small sphere lose all its charge ? That would imply that when I remove it the two spheres have different voltages, which doesn't make sense as they were shorted together. What am I getting wrong here ?

(this is not actually homework - the numbers are arbitrary for the purposes of illustration)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Charge is conserved, voltage is not. The reason voltage (electrical potential energy) is not conserved is mechanical energy is exchanged in separating the spheres
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top