Calculating Charges of Two Small Nonconducting Spheres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Spheres
AI Thread Summary
Two small nonconducting spheres with a total charge of 80 microC exert a repulsive force of 12 N when placed 1.06 m apart. Using Coulomb’s Law, the product of their charges can be calculated as Q1Q2 = 1.498 x 10^-9 C. To find the individual charges, one can substitute Q1 + Q2 = 80 microC into the equation, resulting in a quadratic equation. If the force were attractive, the sign in the equation would change, leading to Q1Q2 = -1.498 x 10^-9 C and a different quadratic equation. This method effectively allows for the determination of each sphere's charge.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
Two small nonconducting spheres have a total charge of 80 microC. When place 1.06 m apart, the force exerts on the other is 12 N and is repulsive. What is the charge of each. What if the force were attractive?

Given: k, F = 12 N if repulsive but F = -12 N if attractive, Q1 + Q2 = 8 x 10^-5 C, r = 1.06 m

Using Coulomb’s Law, isolate Q1Q2 .

Q1Q2 = 1.498 x 10^-9 C?

Then I thought I would use substitution for Q1 + Q2 = 8 x 10^-5 C and Q1Q2 = 1.498 x 10^-9 C.

But now I get a huge quadratic equation. Is this the correct method??

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is correct. You have to solve the qudratic to find Q1, Q2. There really isn't a better way.
 


Yes, you are on the right track! To solve for the individual charges of each sphere, you can use the following equation:

F = k(Q1Q2)/r^2

Substituting in the given values, we have:

12 N = (8.99 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2)(Q1Q2)/(1.06 m)^2

Solving for Q1Q2, we get:

Q1Q2 = 1.498 x 10^-9 C

Now, as you mentioned, we can use substitution to solve for the individual charges. We know that Q1 + Q2 = 8 x 10^-5 C, so we can rewrite the equation as:

Q1 = (8 x 10^-5 C) - Q2

Substituting this into the equation for Q1Q2, we get:

(8 x 10^-5 C - Q2)Q2 = 1.498 x 10^-9 C

Simplifying, we get a quadratic equation:

Q2^2 - (8 x 10^-5 C)Q2 + 1.498 x 10^-9 C = 0

Using the quadratic formula, we can solve for Q2 and then plug that value back into the equation for Q1 to find its value.

If the force were attractive, we would simply change the sign in the equation for F, so we would have:

-12 N = (8.99 x 10^9 Nm^2/C^2)(Q1Q2)/(1.06 m)^2

Solving for Q1Q2, we get:

Q1Q2 = -1.498 x 10^-9 C

Using the same substitution method as before, we get the quadratic equation:

Q2^2 + (8 x 10^-5 C)Q2 + 1.498 x 10^-9 C = 0

Solving for Q2 and then plugging that value back into the equation for Q1, we can find the individual charges for an attractive force.

I hope this helps clarify the process for solving this problem. Keep in mind that the quadratic equation may seem intimidating, but it is a common method for solving problems involving two unknown variables. Good luck!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top