Calculating Complex Power: P+jQ

AI Thread Summary
Complex power is represented as P + jQ, where P is the real power and Q is the reactive power. The formula suggests that complex power is a phasor representation of the reactive and real power components, while the first term, P, is a scalar value and represents average power. The discussion raises questions about the relationship between phasors and scalars, noting that complex power can be expressed in both forms depending on the context. The confusion arises from the interpretation of "jQ," which indicates a phase difference between current and voltage. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities in understanding the terminology and calculations related to complex power in electrical systems.
chopficaro
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
power=P+P(cos(2wt))+Q(cos(2wt))

but

complex power = P+jQ

am i to assume that complex power is a phasor representation of the last two terms? why does this formula ignore the first term?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
and aparently it is also equal to

complex power =(Veff)(Ieff)

which is a scalar, but its also equal to

complex power=(Vphasor)(Iphasor)/2

which is a phasor

how can complex power be both a phasor and a scaler?
 
Please give this a read and see if it answers your question. I think it's good.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/powerac.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
it did! tyvm!
 
chopficaro said:
power=P+P(cos(2wt))+Q(cos(2wt))

but

complex power = P+jQ

am i to assume that complex power is a phasor representation of the last two terms? why does this formula ignore the first term?

Surely Electrical Power is the Dot Produce between the V and I vectors. A dot product is a scalar.
What could "jQ" be? I and V may not be in phase but what has that to do with "complex power"? Is there some problem with actual terminology here?
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top