Calculating compressed air system leakage

AI Thread Summary
To quantify compressed air system leakage, a formula was proposed: % Leakage = (Tx100) / (T+t), where T is total load time and t is unload time. However, the compressor's operation modes complicate this calculation, as the load and unload processes serve different functions. The current assessment suggests a leakage rate of 17.68%, which seems inaccurate given the visible leaks in the system and the expectation of 25-40% leakage for unassessed systems. The calculation fails to account for the distinct roles of load and unload, leading to misleading results. Accurate leakage assessment is crucial, especially considering the compressor's operational context and the significant potential for air loss.
sagaris
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am looking to quanitfy our compressed air system leakage and have followed the usual steps of ensuring all air consuming products are off and then measuring load/unload times.

I intended to use the following formula as found in relevant articles and webpages:

% Leakage = (Tx100) / (T+t)​

where T = total load time
t = unload time

the problem is that our compressor (an Atlas Copco GA 75) has a load, unload and OFF mode (its NOT variable speed) and the only reference i can find that includes load, unload and off into the calculation quite crudley uses the above equation but bundles load and unload together as 'T' then the off mode as 't'.

doing this puts our losses at 17.68% but i am 99% positive this is incorrect, as we have 375 m of 3inch ring main that has never had any air leakage assesment and you can hear it leaking everywhere now that we are in shutdown and then much more so with our ultrasound equipment! apparently 10-15% leakage for a compressor system of our size is acceptable but this just doesn't seem right?! expected plant losses for somewhere that hasn't had leakage assesment before are typically around the 25-40% range.

the load, unload and off equation completely ignores the fact that load and unload are doing opposite things! the off is merely to save energy where as unload is to regulate the desired air pressure. if anything it should be OFF time and unload time together as at that point the rest of the system is not being fed and only the leaks are affecting the system pressure. But by putting unload and OFF times together means the calculation puts leakage at 7.58%...and that is 100% incorrect! (10% is considered a good level of leakage)

any ideas?

thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I should add that the GA 75 (75KW) compressor is one of two and there is an additional 90KW Variable speed drive compressor, so three in all. its just that this is the only time in the year where just one is running so the load, unload and off times can be measured.

with regards to calculating the system leakage it doesn't matter if one or all 3 compressors are running as the reciever is still being filled to the same pressure as during production, with the exception that there is no production load, so just the one can cope.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top