Calculating Compression Time for Mass-Spring Impact: A Comparison of Methods

  • Thread starter Thread starter VinceA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impact
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the compression time for a mass-spring system involving a weight dropped onto a spring. The user has validated equations for deflection and force using Shigley's reference but finds a significant discrepancy in the calculated time to maximum deflection compared to simulation tools. The calculated time is 0.00015 seconds, which is 1/100th of the time reported by simulations, raising questions about potential errors in the approach. The user suspects issues related to the treatment of the collision or unit conversions but has ruled out unit discrepancies. The conversation highlights the complexities of accurately modeling dynamic systems in engineering simulations.
VinceA
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This is a simple(?) problem but my ability to perform basic calculus disappeared long ago. I am working thru the equations for a spring response to a dropped weight. My primary reference is Shigley (for just about everything!) and I've validated the eqn's for deflection and max force. However, I am trying to work out the duration of the event for purposes of estimating simulation time in explicit FEA. Solving for time to max deflection from eqns in Shigley yields exactly 1/200th of the time reported by 2 mechanism simulation tools...who nail the deflection and force as noted above.

Has anyone solved this "compression time" and, if so, can you share the eqn?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Not that you're giving a whole lot of info, but based on what you have listed, I would guess that:
1. You've got one side dealing with the whole colision, and the other dealing with half of it (introducing a factor of 2)
and
2. There's some sort of unit issue providing a factor of 100.

Note that this is a relatively wild guess.
 
I've beat up the units issue so I don't think that's the problem. The system is pretty simple and I've been staring at it for a couple of hours so it didn't occur to me to give more detail... Essentially, I'm looking at a spring to ground with K=238.1 #/in. A weight (W) of 7.43# is being dropped a height (h) of 12 inches onto the spring.

Compression (D) = (W/k)+(W/k)*SQRT[1+((2*h*k)/W)] = 0.897 in.

Force (F) = K*D = 213.6 lbf

Both these calcs agree with the simulation results.

In Shigley "Mechanical Engineering Design", D is determined by assuming a Cosine term in a longer eqn is unity...

Cos[(kg/W)t - Phi] = 1

thus...

(kg/W)t-Phi = 0 or (kg/W)t = Phi or t = (Phi*W)/KG

Phi = Pi/2 + SQRT[atan(W/(2kh))] = 1.84

thus... t = 0.00015 sec

which is 1/100th (not 1/200th...sorry) the duration reported by simulation.

Can anyone see where I messed up? I, of course, waited until the last minute before deciding I wanted to add this to a slide in a webcast tomorrow.

Thanks!
 
...is your calculator set to degrees?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top