Calculating Correlations and Sensitivity Coefficients

SFA10
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a numerical simulation where I'm randomly varying an input parameter.

This results in variations in three output parameters: A, B and C. The output parameters can be assumed to have normal distributions, but are correlated to each other.

If I calculate the mean and standard deviation on the range of values of A, B and C is there any way I could estimate the change in the mean of B and C due to a small change in the mean of A, making some account of the correlations? I was thinking of an approach based on sensitivity coefficients, but I'm not sure that's appropriate.

Any help/advice would be very welcome! Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It sounds to me like the only way you could make a valuable correlation would be if you ran your experiment again with slightly tweaked input parameter, giving you new outputs A', B', C'. Then I'd calculate mean and SD and whatever else you think is good for the new data, and then see the changes between correlated outputs (i.e. A vs A').

I have no idea about the order of magnitude for the relationship of the correlation, or if one could exist, but as an engineer who has often been presented with data that is "supposed to be useful", this is how I would define useful, meaning that the correlation between data is clear and not based on nested calculations if possible.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top