Calculating Cross Section from Neutron Absorption in a Gold Foil

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total thermal neutron cross-section for gold (197Au) after a beam of thermal neutrons passes through a 2mm thick foil, resulting in a 70% reduction in neutrons. The participant attempts to apply the relevant equations but encounters discrepancies in their results compared to the professor's answer of 102 barns. They detail their calculations, including the determination of the number of nuclei per unit volume and the rearrangement of the exponential decay equation. A key point of confusion is whether to use mass in grams or kilograms, which affects the final cross-section results. The participant seeks clarification on their methodology and the correct units to use for accurate calculations.
Dovahkiin
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In an experiment carried out with a beam of thermal neutrons it is found that on traversing a 2mm thick foil of 197Au, some 70% of the neutrons are removed. What is the total thermal neutron cross-section for this isotope of gold? (Density of gold: 19300 kg m-3)

Homework Equations



1. N = N0 exp(-xnσ) - x is thickness, n is number of nuclei per unit volume, σ is cross section
2. moles = mass/A
3. n0 = Na x moles - Na is avagadros number, n0 is number of nuclei

The Attempt at a Solution



I have attempted this question and appear to have used the same method as in the solution given by the professor, but i get a different answer... Am i right?

Firstly, to find n i substitute equation 2 into 3, giving n0 = (Na x m)/A

Then i divide this by the volume: n = n0/V = (Na x m)/(A x V) = (Na/A) x ρ (ρ = density)

Next i rearrange eqn 1: N/N0 = (70%)/(100%) = 0.7 = exp(-xnσ)

This gives: σ = (-ln(0.7))/(xn)

Now I am not sure if i should be using m in grams or kilograms?

My answer:
σ = 3.02 x 10^(-30) m^2 = 0.0302 barns (using m in grams)
σ = 3.02 x 10^(-27) m^2 = 30.2 barns (using m in kg)

Neither of these answers matches the answer given, 102 barns...
Even though my method is identical to the professors method (although he gives no intermediate results, so i don't know if/where i have gone wrong...)

Any help is much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't seem to be able to edit my OP anymore, but I've realized i haven't fully defined all the variables (units in brackets):

. N is the number of particles remaining after the foil
. N0 is the starting number of particles
. x is thickness (m)
. n is number of nuclei per unit volume (m^-3)
. σ is cross section (m^2)
. m is the mass (grams or kg?)
. A is the mass number
. Na is avagadros number
. n0 is number of nuclei
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top