Calculating Current in a Series Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter warnexus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Resistors
AI Thread Summary
In a series circuit, the current through each resistor is the same, but the voltage drops depend on the specific current through each resistor. The discussion highlights a misunderstanding in using the same current for different resistors, emphasizing that the voltage drop across a resistor is determined by the current flowing through it. The correct approach involves applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to ensure the total voltage drop around a loop equals zero. It is crucial to set up equations that accurately reflect the currents through each resistor to solve for unknowns effectively. The conversation concludes with a focus on using mesh analysis for clarity in complex circuits.
warnexus
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



resistors.jpg


Homework Equations



I = E/(R sub_1 + R sub_2)

The Attempt at a Solution



So I tried using the same approach for part a and it did not produce the same result.

here's what i did:

I sub_2 = E sub_2/(R sub_2 + R sub_3)

E sub_2 was given as 1.7V

I sub_2 = (1.7V)/(5) = .34 A <- answer for part b

I also noticed E sub_3 was not given in the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
warnexus said:
So I tried using the same approach for part a and it did not produce the same result.

You got lucky if you got the right answer using this approach for (a) :)

here's what i did:

I sub_2 = E sub_2/(R sub_2 + R sub_3)

If you rearrange that equation, this is what you are saying:

E2 = I2R2 + I2R3

but this isn't true. The current through R2 is I2 but the current through R3 is not I2.
 
for part a I used E sub_1 = I(R sub_1) + I(R sub_3)

really? i got lucky. when i got the answer, I thought I knew how it works but I guess I do not. =(

what should be going in my mind when I approach this type of problem. I was thinking in order to find the current I sub_2 I know it is across from I sub_3 and picked that one because it is closest. that's why I sub_2 was multiplied by R sub_3
 
warnexus said:
what should be going in my mind when I approach this type of problem. I was thinking in order to find the current I sub_2 I know it is across from I sub_3 and picked that one because it is closest. that's why I sub_2 was multiplied by R sub_3

The current through a resistor results in a voltage drop and the total net voltage drop around a loop must be zero -- this is KVL.

In the equation you wrote:
E2 = I2R2 + I2R3

the voltage drop across R3 depends on the current through R3, not the current through R2.

So the correct equation would be:

E2 = I2R2 + I3R3

NOTE: BE CAREFUL THAT THE SIGNS ON THESE CURRENTS AGREE WITH YOUR ASSUMED CURRENT DIRECTIONS

Similarly in (a) you wrote an equation for the left loop but you used the same current through R1 and R3, which is probably not right.

The correct equation would use the currents through R1 (I1) and R2 (I2) to find the voltage drops across R1 and R2.

After you've written those two equations, you'll notice you have three unknowns (I1, I2, I3) so one more equation is needed to solve the system.When I looked at the problem, I saw two loops (KVL) and would have used mesh analysis to solve it but the above is equivalent.
 
thanks. i will use your input to finish this question.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top