Calculating Cyclic Energy from Acceleration (Relative)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating and relating cyclic energy applied to a material under two different conditions of acceleration. Condition 1 involves a force of 1G at 0.1Hz over 47 days, while Condition 2 applies 4.5G at 60Hz for 3600 seconds. The user seeks to determine if the energy from these conditions can be compared or directly related, with preliminary calculations suggesting that Condition 2 may apply significantly more energy. Clarifications are made regarding the nature of the accelerations, emphasizing that both are vertical and cyclic, and raising questions about the effects of these forces on the material. The conversation highlights the complexity of comparing energy under different conditions and the need for further analysis.
Munnaz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am looking at relating two situations under which cyclic energy is applied to a material.

Condition 1: A material has been subjected to a force of 1G at 0.1Hz for 47 days.
Condition 2: The same material has been subjected to a force of 4.5G at 60Hz for 3600Seconds.

Is it possible to calculate the energy applied under both conditions and relate them to one another (i.e. condition 1 has applied 200% the energy applied under condition 2)?
or
Can they be directly related to each other. For example: Under condition 1 the material experiences 406,080 cycles therefore a cumulative total of 406,080G. Under condition 2 the material experiences 216,000 cycles therefore a cumulative total of 972,000G. Therefore condition 2 experiences 240% times the energy condition 1 experiences.

Is either of these possible or is there another way to relate them to one another?

Thanks in advance.
Munnaz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By "cyclic energy" do you mean that the material was spun in a centrifuge at the indicated acceleration?
 
Hi Dale,

Not centrifugal force. Condition 1 is on board a vessel in the ocean and the other is on a vibrating table. Both vertical accelerations.

Regards Munnaz
 
So if the accelerations are vertical and they are cyclic then the magnitude must vary over time. So is the 1 g mentioned a peak-to-peak acceleration or what? Does the material free-fall down?

Also, does the acceleration involve any "squeezing" or "flexing" of the material other than what happens simply due to gravity and being pushed up? In particular, the vibrating table does not seem like it could be done without some additional fixation and stress in the material.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top