Calculating Diffusion Velocity in Electrochemical System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the diffusion motion of ions in an electrochemical system along the y-axis, emphasizing the relationship between concentration and diffusion velocity. It highlights that the diffusion coefficient D and length d are considered constant, leading to a potentially constant diffusion velocity, which raises questions about the term 'diffusion linear velocity.' The conversation critiques the measurement of this velocity, arguing that diffusion is inherently random and should be described using Fick's law and differential equations. Additionally, it connects the concept of diffusion time to the derived relation τ^{dif} = d^2/D, illustrating the relationship between mean square displacement and elapsed time in diffusion processes. The analysis underscores the complexities in understanding and measuring diffusion in electrochemical systems.
ussername
Messages
60
Reaction score
2
Let's suppose an electrochemical system with given coordinates:
RaRKQGY.jpg

We are interested in diffusion motion of ion ##i## in the direction of ##y## axis.
Concentration ##c_i## is a function of both ##x## and ##y##. Concentration ##c_i## at ##y=0## is zero.
The system is steady thus ##\frac{\partial c_i}{\partial y}(x)## is not a function of ##y## (##\frac{\partial c_i}{\partial y}(x)## is constant with ##y##).
The first Fick's law for ion ##i## is (for simplicity I don't write ##i## subscript anymore):
$$J_{y}^{dif}(x,y=d) = - D \cdot \frac{\partial c}{\partial y}(x,y=d) = - D \frac{c(x,y=d)}{d}$$
The diffusion molar flux is:
$$J_{y}^{dif}(x,y=d) = c(x,y=d)\cdot v_{y}^{dif}(x,y=d)$$
where ##v^{dif}## is the diffusion linear velocity of ion ##i##:
$$v_{y}^{dif} = -D \cdot \frac{1}{c}\cdot \frac{\partial c}{\partial y}$$
The diffusion velocity clearly changes because concentration changes with ##y##.
Now I can put the diffusion velocity into the first equation and express ##D##:
$$D = \frac{-c(x,y=d)\cdot v_{y}^{dif}(x,y=d)\cdot d}{c(x,y=d)}=-v_{y}^{dif}(x,y=d)\cdot d$$
This seems strange to me. Since both diffusion coefficient ##D## and length ##d## are considered constant, the diffusion velocity ##v_{y}^{dif}(x,y=d)## seems to be constant along ##x## independently of the functions ##c(x) \ at \ y=d## and ##\frac{\partial c}{\partial y}(x) \ at \ y=d##. Is it true?
 

Attachments

  • RaRKQGY.jpg
    RaRKQGY.jpg
    12 KB · Views: 2,685
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I strongly object to the term 'diffusion linear velocity'. Diffusion is due to random (Brownian) motion of molecules and other particles so what exactly is moving with 'diffusion linear velocity'? how would you measure it?
It makes no sense.
What you do have is Flick's law and it is a differential equation. Add initial and boundary condition, solve it and you have all the answers.
By the way, the diffusion equation is linear.
 
I found this problem when I was trying to derive the relation for diffusion time of ion ##i##:
$$\tau^{dif} = \frac{d^2}{D}$$
In order to understand what ##\tau^{dif}## really means, it is useful to define ##v^{dif}##.

By the way ##v^{dif}## can be measured no worse than for example molar fluxes of diffusion, migration or convection. It can be measured when the diffusion motion prevails.
 
ussername said:
I found this problem when I was trying to derive the relation for diffusion time of ion ##i##:
$$\tau^{dif} = \frac{d^2}{D}$$

When considering random-walk diffusion (for example in one dimension), the equation
<x 2> = 2 D t
relates the mean square displacement <x 2> of diffusing particles with the elapsed time t. Here it is assumed that the particles start out at position x = 0 at time t = 0.
Roughly speaking, a particle with a diffusion coefficient D diffuses thus a distance d in a time t d 2/2D.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top