Calculating Diluted Solutions: Understanding Decimal Notation | Helpful Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter rovaniemi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the concentration of diluted solutions using decimal notation. A user presents a series of dilutions starting from a 10 mg/10 ml solution, diluting it successively by factors of 1/10 and 1/5. Participants clarify that each dilution can be represented as a multiplication of the previous concentration by the dilution factor, leading to a cumulative effect on the concentration. For instance, diluting 10 mg/10 ml to 1/10 results in 0.1, and further diluting that by 1/10 gives 0.01. The key takeaway is that multiple dilutions can be calculated by continuously multiplying the factors together.
rovaniemi
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I have a doubt that I would like to solve with your help.

The 1st solution I have is

10 mg/10 ml
from the above solution 1/10th is diluted that should be (0.1)
from the above 1/10th diluted solution another 1/10 is diluted again
from this once again diluted 1/10th solution 1/5 is again diluted
once again from this 1/5th diluted solution 2.5/5 is again diluted.

My question is is there any formula to calculate the decimal point. I mean 1/10th is denoted as 0.1th, but how to note multiple diluted solutions? from 1/10 to 1/10 to 1/5 to 2.5/5

Thanking you all in advance for your time and replies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi rovaniemi! :smile:
rovaniemi said:
10 mg/10 ml
from the above solution 1/10th is diluted that should be (0.1)

i'm not sure what you mean

do you mean that 10 mg/10 ml is diluted to 1 mg/10 ml ?

or do you mean that 10 mg/10 ml is diluted to 9 mg/10 ml ?​

in the first case, the concentration is multiplied by 0.1

in the second case, the concentration is multiplied by 0.9

if you perform several dilutions, you multiply those factors

for example, if the concentration is multiplied once by a factor of 0.1 and once by a factor of 0.5, then the combined concentration is 0.1 times 0.5, = a factor of 0.05 :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi Tiny Tim,

Thanks for the reply. Just need to confirm what I understood it correct.

I have used the first case where 10mg/10ml is diluted to 1/10

Now it is 0.1.

If I dilute it again to 1/10 .

Then the solution is now 0.1 times 0.1 , so 0.01

Hope this is how it is?

Thank you
 
rovaniemi said:
I have used the first case where 10mg/10ml is diluted to 1/10

Now it is 0.1.

If I dilute it again to 1/10 .

Then the solution is now 0.1 times 0.1 , so 0.01

Hope this is how it is?

yup! :biggrin:

you just keep multiplying! :smile:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top