Calculating div(theta) and tangent curves

  • Thread starter Thread starter renegade05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Tangent
renegade05
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate ∇Θ where Θ(x)=\frac{\vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}}{r^3}. Here \vec{p} is a constant vector and r=|\vec{x}|. In addition, sketch the tangent curves of the vector function ∇Θ for \vec{p}=p\hat{z}

(b) Calculate ∇ (cross) A → \vec{A}=\frac{\vec{m}x\vec{X}}{r^3} m is constant vector. Sketch the tangent curves of ∇(cross)A for \vec{m}=m\hat{z}

Homework Equations



gradient vector

The Attempt at a Solution



Well when I apply the gradient vector to the function Θ I get many terms and a very ugly answer. I am not sure if this will clean up nicely? Is there an easier way of doing this then brute force? Also, I am not sure how to represent the tangent curve of the vector function \vec{p}=p\hat{z} or \vec{m}=m\hat{z}.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sometimes the Ricci calculus is easier than the nabla calculus. BTW: Both questions are not about div but about grad and curl.

For the first problem you have to calculate (Einstein summation convention implied)

\partial_j \Theta=\partial_j \left ( \frac{p_k x_k}{r^3} \right ).
This is now just the task to take the partial derivatives using the usual rules for differentiation (product rule in this case).

For the second problem note that
(\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A})_j = \epsilon_{jkl} \partial_k A_l,
where \epsilon_{jkl} is the Levi-Civita symbol.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top