Calculating Drag Force due to air on a Pedestal Fan blade

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the drag force on a pedestal fan blade powered by a flywheel after power loss. The user seeks to understand how to calculate torque due to drag force and simplify the fan blade geometry. They note that measuring electrical input during operation won't help since the flywheel's RPM decreases over time. It is suggested that the fan affinity laws can be used to relate power consumption to RPM, as power varies with the cube of the RPM. Understanding the relationship between drag force and angular velocity is crucial for solving the problem.
Kaycee92
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am doing a project where in a pedestal fan is alternatively powered using a flywheel. The flywheel is brought to some initial angular velocity by the electric motor. Now, if the power goes off, the fan blades would be coupled to the flywheel and it continues to rotate for the next 10 minutes.

After the power goes off, we have considered that

Energy-flywheel + Energy-fan = ∫ (Torque-drag force * ω -fan) dt

I'm having trouble calculating the torque due to the drag force and how to geometrically simplify the fan blades.

Any solution would be very much helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Why don't you just measure the electrical input to the fan?
 
Yes, but that would give me the power consumed at some constant fan speed( during operation).

When my flywheel is engaged, the rpm keeps on reducing and is a function of time.

If I know how the drag force is related to angular velocity and how much torque is generated, I would then be able to solve.
 
Any idea about drag force, Russ?
 
Kaycee92 said:
Yes, but that would give me the power consumed at some constant fan speed( during operation).

When my flywheel is engaged, the rpm keeps on reducing and is a function of time.
Well, once you have the peak, you can use the fan affinity laws to calculate the power at any rpm. Basically, power is a cube function of rpm.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top