Calculating Elastic Modulus Using Steel Wire Stretching Data

  • Thread starter Thread starter GiovanniG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Steel Wire
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the elastic modulus using data from a steel wire that stretches by 0.038% when a mass is suspended from it. The original poster initially misinterpreted the percentage stretch as a measurement in millimeters, leading to confusion in their calculations. They needed to determine the force (F) and were unsure how to proceed without the original length (l) of the wire. Clarification was provided that the stretch was indeed a percentage of the original length, which helped the poster solve the problem. The exchange highlights the importance of accurately interpreting problem statements in physics.
GiovanniG
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A steel wire 2.9mm in diameter stretches by 0.038{\rm \\%} when a mass is suspended from it. The elastic modulus for steel is 2.0×1011N/m2

*that {\rm \\%} value is in my homework, I assumed it was a mistake and was meant to be mm

Homework Equations


young's module for elasticity F/A=E(Δl/l)

The Attempt at a Solution


So to answer this I think I need to find F because that equals mg, so I'll just divide F by 9.8.

However I'm not given l so inserting the numbers into the equation I get
F/ [(.5*.0029)^2*π]=2.0*10^11{[(l+.00038)-l]/l}
There are two unknowns and I don't know about other equations to answer this problem, usually original length is given so I'm very confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GiovanniG said:

Homework Statement


A steel wire 2.9mm in diameter stretches by 0.038{\rm \\%} when a mass is suspended from it. The elastic modulus for steel is 2.0×1011N/m2

*that {\rm \\%} value is in my homework, I assumed it was a mistake and was meant to be mm

Homework Equations


young's module for elasticity F/A=E(Δl/l)

The Attempt at a Solution


So to answer this I think I need to find F because that equals mg, so I'll just divide F by 9.8.

However I'm not given l so inserting the numbers into the equation I get
F/ [(.5*.0029)^2*π]=2.0*10^11{[(l+.00038)-l]/l}
There are two unknowns and I don't know about other equations to answer this problem, usually original length is given so I'm very confused.
It's not clear what you are supposed to find here, F or the length of the wire.
 
The exact question is "How large is the mass?"
 
GiovanniG said:
The exact question is "How large is the mass?"
What if instead of the wire stretching by 0.038 mm, it stretched by 0.038% of its original length?
 
SteamKing said:
What if instead of the wire stretching by 0.038 mm, it stretched by 0.038% of its original length?

That makes so much more sense and I was able to solve it, thank you so much I was working on this problem forever :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top