Calculating Electric Field at the Center of a Charged Hemisphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at the center of a charged hemisphere with radius R and charge density σ. A suggested approach involves selecting a small area element and integrating the electric field contributions, but confusion arises regarding the use of solid angles and the correct differential area expression. Participants clarify that the area element should be expressed in spherical coordinates, specifically as dA = R² sin(φ) dθ dφ, and emphasize the importance of symmetry in simplifying the calculations. Ultimately, the correct limits for integration are established, leading to a successful resolution of the problem. The conversation highlights the effectiveness of this method over the initial ring element approach.
Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


I have to find the electric field at the center of a hemisphere of radius R with charge density σ.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The easiest way would be to select a ring element of small thickness, find the electric field due to it and integrate.
I am trying to do it by an another method. Let's select a small element of area dA subtending a solid angle dΩ at the center, then
dA=(dΩ)R^2
Charge of this small element is σdA=σ(dΩ)R^2.
Therefore, electric field due to this element is
dE=\frac{kσ(dΩ)R^2}{R^2}
The last job is to resolve the electric field into two components (see attachement) and integrate them separately but i am stuck here. I can't proceed after this because of the cosθ and sinθ.
 

Attachments

  • hemi.png
    hemi.png
    5.1 KB · Views: 406
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solid angle differential element dΩ would need to be swept over the surface of the hemisphere. But this is not something that's inherent in the formalism for the solid angle element; you would need to impose "direction" of the element via some other mathematical mechanism, and you won't be integrating over dΩ...

Why not make your differential area out of a square patch ##(R d\theta)\times(R d\phi)## where ##\theta## and ##\phi## vary to cover the hemisphere? Use symmetry arguments to simplify the calculation (certain components of the field elements dE will cancel over the integration so they can be dropped).
 
gneill said:
Your solid angle differential element dΩ would need to be swept over the surface of the hemisphere. But this is not something that's inherent in the formalism for the solid angle element; you would need to impose "direction" of the element via some other mathematical mechanism, and you won't be integrating over dΩ...
Do you have a link (except wiki) which explains this in a simple way? I am not too much familiar with solid angles. :smile:

gneill said:
Why not make your differential area out of a square patch ##(R d\theta)\times(R d\phi)## where ##\theta## and ##\phi## vary to cover the hemisphere? Use symmetry arguments to simplify the calculation (certain components of the field elements dE will cancel over the integration so they can be dropped).

Assuming ##\theta## for the lateral surface of hemisphere and ##\phi## for semicircle, how do you get ##(R d\theta)\times(R d\phi)##. What i get is an expression like this: ##(R\sin\phi d\theta)\times(R d\phi)##. (see attachment)
 

Attachments

  • dA.png
    dA.png
    7.6 KB · Views: 405
Last edited:
Pranav-Arora said:
Do you have a link (except wiki) which explains this in a simple way? I am not too much familiar with solid angles. :smile:
Sorry, I can't think of a website offhand. Maybe the Wolfram Mathworld site will have something.
Assuming ##\theta## for the lateral surface of hemisphere and ##\phi## for semicircle, how do you get ##(R d\theta)\times(R d\phi)##. What i get is an expression like this: ##(R\sin\phi d\theta)\times(R d\phi)##. (see attachment)

Yeah, you're right. The latitude influences the length of the arc of longitude for spherical coordinates. So the area element looks like

##dA = R^2 sin(\phi) d\theta d\phi##
 
gneill said:
Yeah, you're right. The latitude influences the length of the arc of longitude for spherical coordinates. So the area element looks like

##dA = R^2 sin(\phi) d\theta d\phi##

I am myself confused now. :confused:
It should be ##R\cos\phi## instead of ##R\sin\phi##
 
Ah, well for spherical coordinates the usual practice is to take the angle ##\phi## between the z-axis and the radial vector, rather than between the x-y plane and the vector.
 
gneill said:
Ah, well for spherical coordinates the usual practice is to take the angle ##\phi## between the z-axis and the radial vector, rather than between the x-y plane and the vector.

I am not aware of spherical coordinate system.
But is my expression for differential area correct?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
I am not aware of spherical coordinate system.
But is my expression for differential area correct?

It's fine for the appropriate choice of angles. Set up the integration of the resulting field elements. Again, take advantage of symmetry to simplify the calculation.
 
gneill said:
It's fine for the appropriate choice of angles. Set up the integration of the resulting field elements. Again, take advantage of symmetry to simplify the calculation.

Here's my attempt:
dA=R^2\cos(\phi)d\theta d\phi
dq=σR^2\cos(\phi)d\theta d\phi
dE=\frac{kdq}{R^2}
dE=kσR^2\cos(\phi)d\theta d\phi
We need to integrate only the sin component because the cos component cancels due to symmetry of the situation.
dE\sin(\phi)=\frac{1}{2}kσ\sin(2\phi)d\theta d\phi
Integrating this, i get E=0. :confused:
 
  • #10
What were the limits of your integration?
 
  • #11
##\phi## from 0 to ##\pi## and ##\theta## from 0 to ##2\pi##.
 
  • #12
Pranav-Arora said:
##\phi## from 0 to ##\pi## and ##\theta## from 0 to ##2\pi##.

Ah. You've made your ##\phi## cover the area twice, once from the x-y plane up to the zenith, and then from the zenith back down to the plane. Remember that the ##\theta## will swing the vector all the way around (since it's going from 0 to ##2\pi##), so at any given ##\phi## elevation it will already be swept around the whole surface. Make ##\phi## go from 0 to ##\pi/2##.
 
  • #13
gneill said:
Ah. You've made your ##\phi## cover the area twice, once from the x-y plane up to the zenith, and then from the zenith back down to the plane. Remember that the ##\theta## will swing the vector all the way around (since it's going from 0 to ##2\pi##), so at any given ##\phi## elevation it will already be swept around the whole surface. Make ##\phi## go from 0 to ##\pi/2##.

Oh yes, i get it. I have got the right answer. Thanks a lot gneill. :smile:

This method is way easier than selecting a small ring element.
 
  • #14
Glad it worked out. Cheers.
 
Back
Top