Calculating Energy Change in Compton Scattering

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy change in a two-dimensional Compton scattering scenario involving two objects of equal mass. The user attempts to derive the final energy of the incoming object after a collision, using energy and momentum conservation principles. They express concern about the derived equation suggesting a significant energy loss even for grazing trajectories, questioning the assumptions made regarding the nature of the collision (elastic vs. inelastic). A key point raised is the missing factor of two in the calculations, which affects the final result, indicating a need for careful review of the derivation steps. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying classical mechanics to scenarios typically analyzed with relativistic physics.
ajhunte
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Can Someone look over this and tell me if the work is correct.

Homework Statement


An object comes in with known velocity (v) and known mass (m) moving directly along the x-axis. It strikes another object of the same mass (m) which is stationary. Find the change in energy of the incoming object based on the angle at which it scattered (\theta) and the velocity of the target after the collision (u). The collision only occurs in 2 dimensions. (Note: The angle at which the target object is moving can be removed algebraically.)

E_{i}=Energy of Incoming Object before collision
E_{f}=Energy of Incoming Object after collision
E_{2}=Energy of Target Object after collision

p_{i}= Momentum of incoming object before collision.
p_{f}=Momentum of Incoming object after collision.
p_{2}=Momentum of Target object after collion.

\phi= Arbitrary Angle of Target object scattering (should not matter based on the note.


Homework Equations


E=1/2*m*v^{2}
p=m*v
p^{2}/(2*m)=E

The Attempt at a Solution



Energy Balance:
E_{i}=E_{f}+E_{2}

X-Momentum Balance:
p_{i}=p_{f}*Cos(\theta) +p_{2}*Cos(\phi)

Y-Momentum Balance: (This should be a zero momentum system in y-direction)
p_{f}*Sin(\theta)=p_{2}*Sin(\phi)<br />

Squaring only the Momentum Equations and adding them together.

Y-Balance:
p_{f}^{2}*Sin^{2}(\theta)=p_{2}^{2}*Sin^{2}(\phi)

X-Balance: (after getting \phi isolated on one side then squaring)
p_{2}^{2}*Cos^{2}(\phi)=p_{i}^{2} - p_{i}*p_{f}*Cos(\theta)+p_{f}^{2}*Cos^{2}(\theta)

Adding the two momentum Equations and using Sin^{2}+Cos^{2}=1
p_{2}^{2}=p_{i}^{2}-p_{i}*p_{f}*Cos(\theta)+p_{f}^{2}

Relating back to energy, using the relationship defined in section 2.
Since all masses are the same I divide the newly found momentum equation by 2m in order to get to energy:
E_{2}=E_{i}+E_{f}-\sqrt{E_{i}}*\sqrt{E_{f}}*Cos(\theta)

(Note: \sqrt{2m}*\sqrt{2m}=2m and p/\sqrt{2m}=\sqrt{E} )

Combining with the original Energy Balance Equation to Eliminate E_{2}. This involves subtracting the equation I just solved for and the original equation.
0=2*E_{f}-\sqrt{E_{i}}*\sqrt{E_{f}}*Cos(\theta)

Applying the Quadratic Equation
\sqrt{E_{f}}=\sqrt{E_{i}}*Cos(\theta) +\- \frac{\sqrt{\sqrt{E_{i}}^{2}*Cos^{2}(\theta)-0}}{4}


Minus Sign Answer Leads to 0, so nontrivial answer is:
E_{f}=\frac{E_{i}*Cos^{2}(\theta)}{4}

Is this the correct solution, or is there a step that I made a mistake or false assumption? It seems to me that this is wrong, because even a grazing trajectory decreases the initial energy by 3/4.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


This is essentially compton scattering. Why do you have to angles? Also, are you assuming it is inelastic, or were you told that it is inelastic? I would probably assume an elastic collision.
 


Your right, this is basically compton scattering without the relativisitic effects. That is why the first 4 steps are the same as the Compton Scattering derivation. The difference is that the since this does not use relativistic effects:
E=\frac{p^{2}}{2m}

For Compton Scattering, the conversion between energy and momentum for Photons and relativistic electron is different:

For Relativistic Electrons: pc=\sqrt{E_{0}^{2}-m_{0}^{2}c^{4}}

For Photons: \frac{E}{c}

This is where the difference is. That is why I asked the question, because this answer does not seem intuitive that if I have a grazing trajectory (i.e. \theta goes to 0) I still lose 3/4 of the energy.
 


Hi ajhunte,

ajhunte said:
Can Someone look over this and tell me if the work is correct.

Homework Statement


An object comes in with known velocity (v) and known mass (m) moving directly along the x-axis. It strikes another object of the same mass (m) which is stationary. Find the change in energy of the incoming object based on the angle at which it scattered (\theta) and the velocity of the target after the collision (u). The collision only occurs in 2 dimensions. (Note: The angle at which the target object is moving can be removed algebraically.)

E_{i}=Energy of Incoming Object before collision
E_{f}=Energy of Incoming Object after collision
E_{2}=Energy of Target Object after collision

p_{i}= Momentum of incoming object before collision.
p_{f}=Momentum of Incoming object after collision.
p_{2}=Momentum of Target object after collion.

\phi= Arbitrary Angle of Target object scattering (should not matter based on the note.


Homework Equations


E=1/2*m*v^{2}
p=m*v
p^{2}/(2*m)=E

The Attempt at a Solution



Energy Balance:
E_{i}=E_{f}+E_{2}

X-Momentum Balance:
p_{i}=p_{f}*Cos(\theta) +p_{2}*Cos(\phi)

Y-Momentum Balance: (This should be a zero momentum system in y-direction)
p_{f}*Sin(\theta)=p_{2}*Sin(\phi)<br />

Squaring only the Momentum Equations and adding them together.

Y-Balance:
p_{f}^{2}*Sin^{2}(\theta)=p_{2}^{2}*Sin^{2}(\phi)

X-Balance: (after getting \phi isolated on one side then squaring)
p_{2}^{2}*Cos^{2}(\phi)=p_{i}^{2} - p_{i}*p_{f}*Cos(\theta)+p_{f}^{2}*Cos^{2}(\theta)

You are missing a factor of two here. The factor of two will keep the four from appearing in the denominator of the final answer.
 


Thank You, That is exactly what I was missing.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top