Calculating Energy Loss in Pool Table Cushion Collisions Using Hooke's Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elasticity Table
AI Thread Summary
Calculating energy loss in pool table cushion collisions using Hooke's Law is not feasible, as the law assumes perfect elasticity with no energy loss. Real-world dynamics of pool tables involve inconsistencies across different rail sections and the influence of ball spin. The impact force also affects the angle of rebound, with harder hits resulting in less deflection. Ultimately, understanding these interactions requires practical experience rather than mathematical precision. Enjoying the game is emphasized over complex calculations.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

if a cue ball moving at a certain velocity collides with the side cushion generally the ball will not deflect at a nice angle as the ball would compress into the cushion due to the elasticity of the cushion and energy loss of the ball to the cushion would be reduced. Using Hooke's Law how do i calculate the energy loss of the cue ball if the initial velocity and the distance of compression into the cushion is known. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you can't.
 
Hooke's law assumes perfect elasticity: no energy loss at all. You cannot calculate energy loss using Hooke's law
 
As a player, I can tell you that there is almost never any consistency from one section of rail to another. You also have to factor in the spin on the ball. Another important factor is how hard the ball impacts the rail; the harder it hits, the less angle of rebound there is. Really, all that you can do to figure out what happens is trial and error.
 
Real life pool table dynamics is just one of those innumerable things that are too difficult to talk intelligently about (that is, use the language of maths).

Have a beer and just enjoy the game, okay?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top