Calculating energy of a geosynchronous satellite

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Satellite
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the total energy of a geosynchronous satellite, the formulas for kinetic and potential energy are applied. The kinetic energy is calculated using the formula Kinetic E = 1/2mV^2, while the potential energy requires adjusting for gravitational force at the satellite's altitude. The user correctly noted that gravity is not constant at 9.8 m/s² and recalculated it using Fg = Gm1m2/d². However, it was pointed out that geosynchronous satellites actually orbit at a much higher altitude than 325 km, and a satellite at this height with a speed of 5000 m/s would not maintain orbit. Therefore, the calculations presented are based on an incorrect premise regarding the satellite's altitude.
mikee
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

hey i was just wondering if i was on the right track here, the question is calculate the total energy(E) of a geosynchronous satelite (that orbits around a fixed spot) with a mass of 1500kg orbiting Earth at a height of 325km with an orbital speed of 5000 m/s,

Homework Equations



ok i was taught that Total E = Kinetic E + Potential E, and also that Kinetic E= 1/2mV^2 and Potential E= mgH

The Attempt at a Solution


ok i took into account that gravity would not be 9.8 so
i calculated what it would be Using Fg=Gm1m2/d^2 and i came up with 1.32x10^4,also note that to calculate distace i added 325km to the radius of the earth, then i plugged
in 1/2(1500)(5000)^2 + 1.32x10^4(1500)325000 = Total E, does this seem correct? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember energy is force * distance and so gravitatonal potential energy = GMm/r
 
There is a problem with the question. Geosynchronous satellites do not orbit at 325 Km height. And a satellite at 325km with an orbital speed of 5000m/s will fall back to earth.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top