Calculating Energy of Shortest Wavelength Photon in Hydrogen Atom

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Proton
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
as the radius of an electron orbit increases, the total energy of the electron decreases because of the relationship: E=\frac{-Z^2E_o}{n^2} right? does this means that the electron's kinetic energy would also decreas too?

if I was asked to find the energy of the shortest wavelength photon that can be emitted by a hydrogen atom, I would use:

\frac{1}{\lambda}=R[\frac{1}{n_1^2}-\frac{1}{n_2^2}]
\frac{1}{\lambda}=1.0973731x10^7[\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{infinity}]
\lambda=91.12667nm

so E=hc/91.12667nm=13.605698eV

is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
UrbanXrisis said:
as the radius of an electron orbit increases, the total energy of the electron decreases because of the relationship: E=\frac{-Z^2E_o}{n^2} right? does this means that the electron's kinetic energy would also decreas too?

Are you using the Bohr model? If so, keep in mind that it's a classical approximation, not a correct model of the atom. Within the context of the model, however, you first statement isn't quite right. As you move to larger radius (larger n), the total energy becomes less negative -- that is, increases. The kinetic energy does, however, decrease.

so E=hc/91.12667nm=13.605698eV

That's correct. This is also known as the "ground state energy" of hydrogen.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top