Calculating Energy Stored in a Parallel-Plate Capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter yayovio10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy stored in a parallel-plate capacitor with varying plate separation. Participants explore the use of formulas for energy and capacitance, emphasizing the need to divide the capacitor into smaller sections due to the uneven separation. Suggestions include integrating to find energy density and using the formula U=1/2CV^2 for energy calculations. There is a debate about the complexity of the approach and the necessity of introducing charge in the calculations. Ultimately, clarity in the calculations and following structured steps are highlighted as essential for solving the problem effectively.
yayovio10
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A parallel-plate capacitor with plates of area (0.5m) * (1m) has a distance separation of 2 [cm] and a voltage difference of V = 200 [V], as shown in Fig.

figura.png


a) Find the energy stored

b) keep d1 = 2 [cm] and the voltage difference V, while increasing d2 = 2.2 [cm]. Find the energy stored (hint hint u=1/2CV^2)

Homework Equations



ecuaciones_usadas.png


The Attempt at a Solution



intento.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could try dividing the capacitor into lots of narrow capacitors in parallel.
 
but how if d1=2 and d2=2.2, can you still use the capacitor formulas even if its a uneven capacitor?
 
You have to divide it into smaller capacitors than that.
 
can you give me a little example please, i just cannot imagine since one side is uneven :(
 
Have you not done any calculus?
 
so for example i will use this formula E = Δ V / Δ d, and by dividing the plates in very tiny plates
i can now write E as E = ∑ (Δ V / Δd), but since we V is constant E= V (∑ (1/Δd)) so this will be the same as E=V∫((1/dx)) from d1 to d2 where d=x?

is this approach correct? and then calculate the charge and then the energy?
 
ok so i was wondering if so for example i will use this formula E = Δ V / Δ d, and by dividing the plates in very tiny plates i can now write E as E = ∑ (Δ V / Δd), but since we V is constant E= V (∑ (1/Δd)) so this will be the same as E=V∫((1/dx)) from d1 to d2 where d=x?

is this approach correct? and then calculate the charge and then the energy?
 
Looks unwieldy. What happens to your stack of plates when you reach d = 2cm?

How about this instead: compute the E field as a function of x along the bottom plate: x = 0 on the left and x = 0.5m on the right. Compute the energy in a typical volume dx d(x) 1m and integrate.
 
  • #10
the idea is that i can divide the plates in very tine ones and will use this forumula

Q \equiv εA(Δ V / Δd) and will set A\equiv dxdy and d \equiv dz

so the new equation will be like
Q \equiv εV \int_0^1 {dx} \int_0^.5 {dy} \int_a^b{1/dz}

where a\equiv2 and b\equiv2.2


and then use u \equiv QV(1/2) is this correct?
 
  • #11
Kinda... why introduce the charge?

You want to use ##U=\frac{1}{2}CV^2\implies dU = \frac{1}{2}V^2\;dC##

Put the x-axis in the direction the separation of the plates varies.
Divide the width into strips L=1m long, and dx wide... this is a row of parallel plate capacitors in parallel... you know how to find the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor.

If we put the x-axis so the separation goes like: d(x=0)=2m and d(x=0.5)=2.2m, you can find an expression for d(x)

From that, and knowing that V is the same for all the capacitor elements, you can find:
dC= (the capacitance of the element at position x)
... get this from the expression for the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor.

Use that to get an expression of form: ##dU = f(x)\;dx##, and integrate both sides.
 
  • #12
There's no need to compute capacitance, though it can be done that way of course.

The direct way is to use the formula energy = energy density times volume. What is the energy density of a field E in vacuo?
 
  • #13
using C\equiv \frac{εA}{d} where A= area of plates and the distance is a function of x d(x) \equiv 2 + 0.4x

we get

C\equiv ε \frac{\int_{0}^{1}dy \int_{0}^{.5}dx}{\int_{0}^{.5}(2+.4x)dx}then substituting in U \equiv \frac{1}{2} ε V^2 C

we can get

U \equiv \frac{1}{2} ε V^2 \frac{\int_{0}^{1}dy \int_{0}^{.5}dx}{\int_{0}^{.5}(2+.4x)dx}

is this correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Simon Bridge said:
Kinda... why introduce the charge?

You want to use ##U=\frac{1}{2}CV^2\implies dU = \frac{1}{2}V^2\;dC##

Put the x-axis in the direction the separation of the plates varies.
Divide the width into strips L=1m long, and dx wide... this is a row of parallel plate capacitors in parallel... you know how to find the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor.

If we put the x-axis so the separation goes like: d(x=0)=2m and d(x=0.5)=2.2m, you can find an expression for d(x)

From that, and knowing that V is the same for all the capacitor elements, you can find:
dC= (the capacitance of the element at position x)
... get this from the expression for the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor.

Use that to get an expression of form: ##dU = f(x)\;dx##, and integrate both sides.

is this approach correct in my last reply?
 
  • #15
I don't think so - you have too many integrals.
 
  • #16
Simon Bridge said:
I don't think so - you have too many integrals.

where am i wrong?
 
  • #17
Why not go step-by-step through the suggestion in post #11?

you have:
1. expression for d(x): ##d=2+2x/5## (better to avoid decimals in equations - if you can)

You still need the others:
If the plates are 1m long and dx wide - what is their area?

Therefore:
2. dC=

Therefore:
3. dU=
 
  • #18
ok so after trying with my friend we got this,

image.png


is this right now?
 
  • #19
Since you will not answer questions or follow suggestions, I cannot help you.
 
  • #20
Simon Bridge said:
Why not go step-by-step through the suggestion in post #11?

you have:
1. expression for d(x): ##d=2+2x/5## (better to avoid decimals in equations - if you can)

You still need the others:
If the plates are 1m long and dx wide - what is their area?

Therefore:
2. dC=

Therefore:
3. dU=

is the last reply right?
 
  • #21
OP - is your answer 4.22 μJ? Your work is very hard to read.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top