Calculating Energy Usage for a Jet Airliner

  • Thread starter Thread starter girlinterrupt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating energy usage for a jet airliner, specifically focusing on gravitational potential energy, kinetic energy, and fuel consumption based on energy efficiency. The problem involves concepts from mechanics and energy conversion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy, with one participant expressing uncertainty about how to approach the fuel consumption question. There is an exploration of how to relate energy requirements to fuel usage, considering efficiency.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the fuel consumption calculation, suggesting that the energy required can be derived from previous calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of efficiency on fuel usage, with participants questioning how to accurately interpret the problem's requirements.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of understanding the question's phrasing, particularly regarding the relationship between energy and fuel consumption. There is also mention of the importance of precision in calculations, especially when dealing with large numbers and efficiency factors.

girlinterrupt
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Can someone please check my answers and possibly help with part c; I don't know where to begin on solving it.

Homework Statement



A 31000kg jet airliner is flying at 11000m doing 910 km/h.

(a) What is the jet’s gravitational potential energy (GPE) at 11000m? (GPE=0 at sea level)
(b) What is the jet’s kinetic energy (KE)?
(c) If the jet fuel used contains 30.3MJ of energy per litre and the jet engines are 30% efficient at converting the fuel’s
energy, how much fuel is used just to raise the jet’s potential from sea level to 11000m


The Attempt at a Solution


What is known:

m= 31000kg
h= 11000m
g=9.8m/s
v = 910km/h
e = 30.3 MJ/L

Answer:
a)
Gravitational Potential Energy:
U = mgh
U = 31000 x 9.8 x 11000
U = 3341800000 J = 3.3 x 10^9 J

b)

K = 1/2 mv^2
K = 1/2 31000 x 910000^2
K = 12835550000000000 = 1 x 1016 J

c) I have no idea where to start with this one!

Thanks, any help is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

girlinterrupt said:
A 31000kg jet airliner is flying at 11000m doing 910 km/h.

(a) What is the jet’s gravitational potential energy (GPE) at 11000m? (GPE=0 at sea level)
(b) What is the jet’s kinetic energy (KE)?
(c) If the jet fuel used contains 30.3MJ of energy per litre and the jet engines are 30% efficient at converting the fuel’s
energy, how much fuel is used just to raise the jet’s potential from sea level to 11000m

Hi girlinterrupt! Welcome to PF! :smile:

You know from a) how many joules you need, so for c) just do the arithmetic, making allowance for the megajoules and the 30%! :smile:
 
Hi tiny-tim,

Firstly, thanks for the reply!

I'm finding it difficult to work out what the question was actually asking... I am so new to physics.

so basically if I think of the 30.3MJ per litre at 100% efficiency, I can work out the energy required at 30% efficiency... the thing that has thrown me in the question is "how much fuel is used"... but i suppose it is valid to equate it in terms of this...

30300000 J per litres of fuel * 3.3 (efficiency) = 99990000 J / Litre of Fuel

Sound good?
 
Hi girlinterrupt! :smile:
girlinterrupt said:
so basically if I think of the 30.3MJ per litre at 100% efficiency, I can work out the energy required at 30% efficiency... the thing that has thrown me in the question is "how much fuel is used"... but i suppose it is valid to equate it in terms of this...

30300000 J per litres of fuel * 3.3 (efficiency) = 99990000 J / Litre of Fuel

Sound good?

That's it!

Just two tips …

i] use 10^ or mega … if you write all those 0s, sooner or later you'll make a mistake

ii] why approximate, with 3.3 … the question deliberately makes the arithmetic easy, so why not use 10/3 exactly? :smile:
 
Thanks for the help and tips! :smile:

I Appreciate it!
 

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K