Calculating Equilibrium Constant and Making a Buffer with NH4Cl and NH3

  • Thread starter Thread starter BThomas1219
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the equilibrium constant using Gibbs energy, it's essential to assume a standard temperature of 298.15K, allowing the use of the equation ΔG = RTlnK. The discussion highlights the need for clarity on how to derive K without explicit temperature data. For creating a buffer with a target pH of 9.0, the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation is recommended to determine the required concentration of NH4Cl. The conversation emphasizes starting with the equilibrium constant calculation before applying the buffer equation for the solution.
BThomas1219
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the equilibrium constant if you are given gibbs energy for the following molecules
NH3=-26kJ/mol
H2O-237.13kJ/mol
NH4+=-79.31kJ/mol
OH-=157.3kJ/mol

How many moles of NH4Cl must be added to 1.0L of 0.10M NH3 to make a buffer whose pH is 9.0?



Homework Equations


Henderson hasselbach equation,
delta G=RTlnK



The Attempt at a Solution


1) How do you calculate equilibrium constant if you don’t have the temperature to use G=RTlnK
2) For the second half the question, I am thinking of using Henderson hasselbach equation to determine the concentration of NH4Cl. If not, how should I go about solving this question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just need some help starting out with the problem
 
I believe unless otherwise stated, you assume T=298.15K (standard conditions).

I'm not familiar enough with buffer solutions to help with the rest, sorry!
 
Once you have K, Henderson-Hasselbalch is the way to go.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top