MHB Calculating Equity in Company A: 1.2% for $600,000.00

  • Thread starter Thread starter Confused00901
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    company
AI Thread Summary
To acquire 1.2% equity in Company A, valued at $50 million, a customer must invest $600,000. Since Company C holds 60% of Company A's value, it is worth $30 million. Therefore, to obtain the desired equity, the customer needs to purchase 2% of Company C, which equates to $600,000 divided by $30 million. The discussion highlights the complexities of equity distribution between Company A, B, and C. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate investment calculations.
Confused00901
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Company A’s value is stated at $50,000,000.00 the company is set up into 2 separate entities Company B with 40% equity and Company C with 60% equity. If a customer wants to own 1.2% of Company A, but only wants to hold part of Company C at 60%, how much would the customer have to spend to buy 1.2% of Company A?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1.2% of Company A’s value of 50 million is 600,000

not clear what Company C’s equity of 30 million has to do with that 1.2%
 
They only want to buy into Company C, and not Company B. So what amount do they have to pay to invest in C since that company holds 60%?
 
Confused00901 said:
They only want to buy into Company C, and not Company B. So what amount do they have to pay to invest in C since that company holds 60%?

Purchasing 600,000 of equity from company C is still 1.2% of company A since C is contained within A.
Still not seeing how the equity shares of A held by B and C make any difference.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll ask the accountant that question. Even though I own a business, I've never been involved in the money side of the business. This may have caused me to go bankrupt last year. I can't 100% blame the person who did all the accounting, but he should have warned me about possible financial difficulties. I had to consult with antonybatty.com for a month to restart the business successfully. Now I also work in the accounting industry, but it has become more difficult with the start of inflation worldwide.
 
I am interpreting he "only wants to hold part of Company C at 60%" to mean that he wants to buy only a share of company C, none of company B.

Company A is worth \$50,000,000. Company C is worth 60% of that, \$30,000,000. 1.2% of \$50,000,000 is \$600,000. He must buy $\frac{600000}{30000000}= 0.02$ or 2% of company C.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top