Calculating Excavated Tar Sands in One Hour: Math Exam Review Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mozart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a math problem related to calculating the amount of tar sands excavated by a circular excavator over one hour. The position of the bucket is given by a sinusoidal function, and participants attempt to derive the correct total weight of excavated tar sands, which is stated to be 1,800,000 kg. Confusion arises regarding the use of derivatives to find angular velocity and the correct interpretation of the function's period. Ultimately, two solutions are presented, one using trigonometric properties and the other involving calculus, both leading to the correct answer but highlighting different approaches. The original poster expresses gratitude for the help and notes that the exam was simpler than anticipated.
Mozart
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
My final math exam is tomorrow, and I am having trouble with some questions as I go through this review package.

I have the answers so its very frustrating to arrive at the wrong answer over, and over.

Anyways the question is:

The position of a bucket on a circular tar sands excavator is given by the equation: p(t)= 10sin(6pit + 3pi) + 20

Where t is the time in minutes. There are 20 buckets on the excavator and each holds 500 kg

How many kilograms of tar sands are excavated in one hour?

The answer is 1800000 kg

This is what I did: p(t)=10sin(6pi(60)+3pi) + 20
P(t)= 28.69

from here I am lost so I just did 500 x 20= 10000
10000 x 28.69= 286900 kg

Can someone please help me? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How many times have did one excavator come to its starting place? How many times have did 20 excavators come to its starting place? can you answer these questions?
 
Are you to a calculus level yet? Can you take the derivative of the function you stated? The derivative of position is velocity...angular velocity in this case.
 
Well I think the period is .0055555556. I assume its that since I am using 6pi(60) as b. So 2pi/b gives me .0055555... When I plug in 60 minutes into the equation I get like 28.69. So I divided 28.69 by the period and got 5164.199959. Then I multiplied 5164.2 by 20 since there is 20 other buckets, and got 103284. I then multiplied this by 500 kg and got 51651999.6 kg.

Sorry Fred I havn't been exposed to any sort of calculus yet.
 
Think of the equation this way. The constant c does not change anything actually so we need not pay any heed to it, right? That's because we are interested in the period of this function. now take sin(6\pi*x+3\pi) like this sin(a+b)

Can you conclude anything about the function from here? The given function is actually equal to -10sin(6\pix). What can you do now?

Fred, I don't understand, what does this quesation have to do with the derivatives? We do not need to find the velocity. Or am I missing something?
 
It seems I cannot edit my posts for some unknown reason. Anyway the last latexed equation should be

-10sin(6\pi*x)
 
I am really confused now. I don't know how you went from sin(6pix+3pi) to
-10sin(6pix). It seems I can't even answer your simple questions. What chance do I have in finding the answer.
 
Do you know the sum formula for sine function that says

sin(a+b)=sina*cosb+cosa*sinb?

All I did was replacing

a=6\pi*x, b=3\pi

and while doing the calculations heed that

cos(3\pi)=-1, sin(3\pi)=0 .

Do you understand it now?
 
wisredz said:
Fred, I don't understand, what does this quesation have to do with the derivatives? We do not need to find the velocity. Or am I missing something?
I took the derivative of the position function with respect to t and used that and the fact that there are 20 buckets and they hold 500 kg. My answer rounded to the one given. Seemed to work ok for me.
 
  • #10
Well from using the period of the function I get the exact answer. As I said, the function is actually

-10sin(6\pi*x)

The period of this function is 1/3. so, until x=60 this function repeats itself 180 times.

Multiply this by 50*20, and you get the answer.
Could you help me understanding your solution? I still have no idea how to use the deriative.
 
  • #11
Like I said, there's a rounding issue, but I did this:

P(t) = 10 \sin (6 \pi t + 3 \pi) + 20

P'(t) = (10)(6 \pi) \cos (6 \pi t + 3 \pi)

Evaluate the derivative at t=60 to calculate the number of times the wheel has gone around:

P'(60) = 188.45
I used absolute value here since the negative value really doesn't mean anything.[/size]

To get the total # of kg:
Total = (188.45 revs)(20 \frac{buckets}{rev})(500 \frac{kg}{bucket})

Total = 1.88 x 10^6 kg
 
  • #12
I don't see the point still. I mean P'(t) is the velocity and pluggin 60 into this we get the speed of one bucket at time t=60. As far as i am concerned this is not the number of times the wheel has gone around.

Am I wrong?
 
  • #13
Wisredz,
You got me to see I forgot a part of my solution!

P(t) = 10 \sin (6 \pi t + 3 \pi) + 20

P'(t) = (10)(6 \pi) \cos (6 \pi t + 3 \pi)

Evaluate the derivative at t=60 to calculate the number of ANGULAR VELOCITY of the wheel:

\omega = P'(60) = 188.45 \frac{rad}{min}
I used absolute value here since the negative value really doesn't mean anything.[/size]

Now calculate the number of revolutions the wheel has gone thru:
\theta = (188.5 \frac{rad}{min})(60 min)(\frac{1 rev}{2 \pi rad})
\theta = 1800 rev

To get the total # of kg:
Total = (1800 revs)(20 \frac{buckets}{rev})(500 \frac{kg}{bucket})

Total = 18.00 x 10^6 kg

Thanks for keeping me honest!
 
  • #14
Anytime :)

Mozart, now you have two solutions to choose from. Mine is just a simple trigonometric solution, Fred's is a much more explanatory of the motion because he uses the derivative to find the angular velocity, which gives a lot more info about the info. Both of the solutions give the correct answer so here you go!

Cheers
 
  • #15
Hey thanks guys, and sorry for the late response, but some genius decided to put my exam on the day of the prom, and well I was kind of out of it for a few days. Anyways the exam turned out to be quite simple. Nothing was as hard as this question. I know it's not really a hard question for you guys but for me its pretty complicated. Well thanks again.
 
  • #16
Actually, Fred's answer is high by a factor of 10.

And you don't need to take the first deriviative to find \omega. The equation you have is of the form :

x = R sin(\omega t + \phi )

You just have to read off the coefficient of 't' to find the angular velocity \omega. In this case, \omega = 6 \pi. The rest follows as Fred described.

Fred, you found \dot{x} = v = R \omega. You must divide by R = 10, to get the right answer.
 
  • #17
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...crud. You're right.
 
Back
Top