Calculating First Order Photon Self-Energy Integral

lornstone
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to calculate the first order photon self-energy.

At a point, I must calculte the following integral :
\int d^4k \frac{(k+q)^\mu k^\nu+(k+q)^\nu k^\mu - g^{\mu \nu}(k \cdot(k+q) - m^2}{k^2 + 2x(q\cdot k) + xq^2 -m^2}

I know that I must wick rotate and that k^2 will become -k_E^2.
But I don't know what terms like (k+q)^\mu k^\nu will become.

Can anybody help me?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those terms will just stay the same. All you have to do is keep in mind that in the k^\mu k^\nu tensor, (\mu,\nu)=(0,0) component will acquire a minus sign and the (0,i) and (i,0) components for i=\{1,2,3\} will have a factor of i.

But you do not need to worry about these changes. Just proceed with your calculation.
 
Thank you!

But now I wonder if I can also wick rotate q so that after the change of variable k' = k+ qx I will get no linear term in k in the denominator.
 
Of course, you Wick rotate all four-vectors, i.e., both the integration variables (loop momenta) and the external momenta that are not integrated out. After that, of course, you can do any manipulations like substitutions etc.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
980
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top