Calculating force and work done with 3D vectors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force and work done for an object following a specified trajectory. The force acting on the object is derived as F(t) = -4t^-2 i - 3/2 t^-3/2 j, which is confirmed to be in the correct vector form. To find the work done between t=1 and t=2, the user is advised to compute the integral of the dot product of force and displacement, expressed as ∫(F ⋅ dr). However, the user encounters a negative value when applying the limits, indicating a potential error in the integration or limits used. Clarification is sought on the correct approach to ensure accurate calculation of work done.
r.physics
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The question is as follows:

An object of mass m=1 follows the trajectory:

r(t) = 4 ln(t) i + 6t1/2 j + 2t k

Calculate the force acting on the object and hence find work done between t=1 and t=2.

I know that Force = Mass * Acceleration

Therefore, F(t) = 1 * a(t)

I also know that a(t) = r(t)''

After differentiating I end up with r(t)'' = -4t-2 i - 3/2 t-3/2 j

So I've ended up with

F(t) = -4t-2 i - 3/2 t-3/2 j

Is that my final answer for the force acting on the object, do I leave it in vector form?

For the work done part, I know that Work Done = Force x Distance

I have force and displacement in vector form but I don't know how to end up with a completely numerical value as I've got a time interval for t, I'm assuming there will be some sort of integration involved.

Can someone please tell me if I have done the first part correctly (calculating the force acting on the object) and if so how can I use this along with the conditions t=1 and t=2 to calculate work done? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
r.physics said:
Is that my final answer for the force acting on the object, do I leave it in vector form?
I think so, for the general concept of force contains its direction.
For the remained part, I suggest you try to calculate the tiny work ##dW## with the tiny displacement ##d\mathbf{r}## and then get their sum.
 
tommyxu3 said:
I think so, for the general concept of force contains its direction.
For the remained part, I suggest you try to calculate the tiny work ##dW## with the tiny displacement ##d\mathbf{r}## and then get their sum.

Thankyou for your reply. If I'm understanding what your suggesting correctly, I would now do:

∫dw = ∫ (F ⋅ dr) between the limits of t=2 and t=1

This leaves me with

Δw = [ 4t-1 i + 3t-1/2 j + 2 k ]⋅[4 ln(t) i + 6t1/2 j + 2t k]

With the limits being 2 and 1, I don't think I have done what you meant correctly as when I plug the limits in I end up with a negative answer for work done, any idea where I'm going wrong?

Thanks!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top