Calculating force and work done with 3D vectors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force and work done for an object following a specified trajectory. The force acting on the object is derived as F(t) = -4t^-2 i - 3/2 t^-3/2 j, which is confirmed to be in the correct vector form. To find the work done between t=1 and t=2, the user is advised to compute the integral of the dot product of force and displacement, expressed as ∫(F ⋅ dr). However, the user encounters a negative value when applying the limits, indicating a potential error in the integration or limits used. Clarification is sought on the correct approach to ensure accurate calculation of work done.
r.physics
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The question is as follows:

An object of mass m=1 follows the trajectory:

r(t) = 4 ln(t) i + 6t1/2 j + 2t k

Calculate the force acting on the object and hence find work done between t=1 and t=2.

I know that Force = Mass * Acceleration

Therefore, F(t) = 1 * a(t)

I also know that a(t) = r(t)''

After differentiating I end up with r(t)'' = -4t-2 i - 3/2 t-3/2 j

So I've ended up with

F(t) = -4t-2 i - 3/2 t-3/2 j

Is that my final answer for the force acting on the object, do I leave it in vector form?

For the work done part, I know that Work Done = Force x Distance

I have force and displacement in vector form but I don't know how to end up with a completely numerical value as I've got a time interval for t, I'm assuming there will be some sort of integration involved.

Can someone please tell me if I have done the first part correctly (calculating the force acting on the object) and if so how can I use this along with the conditions t=1 and t=2 to calculate work done? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
r.physics said:
Is that my final answer for the force acting on the object, do I leave it in vector form?
I think so, for the general concept of force contains its direction.
For the remained part, I suggest you try to calculate the tiny work ##dW## with the tiny displacement ##d\mathbf{r}## and then get their sum.
 
tommyxu3 said:
I think so, for the general concept of force contains its direction.
For the remained part, I suggest you try to calculate the tiny work ##dW## with the tiny displacement ##d\mathbf{r}## and then get their sum.

Thankyou for your reply. If I'm understanding what your suggesting correctly, I would now do:

∫dw = ∫ (F ⋅ dr) between the limits of t=2 and t=1

This leaves me with

Δw = [ 4t-1 i + 3t-1/2 j + 2 k ]⋅[4 ln(t) i + 6t1/2 j + 2t k]

With the limits being 2 and 1, I don't think I have done what you meant correctly as when I plug the limits in I end up with a negative answer for work done, any idea where I'm going wrong?

Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top