Calculating Force Constant of a Spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter aishax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force constant of a spring with a 0.256-kg mass stretched by 0.182 m, conservation of energy principles are applied. Initially, all energy is potential when the spring is stretched, and at the equilibrium position, it is entirely kinetic. The kinetic energy at equilibrium is calculated as E = (1/2)mv^2, yielding approximately 0.0712 J. This energy is equal to the potential energy stored in the spring, expressed as E = (1/2)Ks*S^2, leading to the calculation of the spring constant Ks as approximately 4.301 N/m. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying energy conservation in spring dynamics.
aishax
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
A spring is suspended from a celing and a 0.256-kg mass is attatched to it and pulled down to stretch the spring by 0.182 m. The mass is released and travels through the equilibrium position with a speed of 0.746 m/s. Calculate the force constant on the spring.

I'm not really sure how to tackle this question.
What I ended up trying was looking at the two points being addressed (the point where the spring is stretched 0.182 meters downwards, and the equilibrium).

Using the conservation of energy, I put the equation:

E total1 = E total2

(Where E total1 is at the point where the spring is stretched, and E total2 is the point at which the spring passes the equilibrium)

I then put:

Ep + Ek + Ee = Ep + Ek + Ee

I canceled out Ep ( because h = 0), and Ek (because v = 0) on the left side of the equation. I canceled out Ee on the right side of the equation because x = 0. The equation became:

Ee = Ep +Ek


So far, am I on the right track, or is what I did completely wrong? Could this question be done a simplier way using the formula: Fs = -kx ?

Help is very much appreciated :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
aishax said:
A spring is suspended from a celing and a 0.256-kg mass is attatched to it and pulled down to stretch the spring by 0.182 m. The mass is released and travels through the equilibrium position with a speed of 0.746 m/s. Calculate the force constant on the spring.

I'm not really sure how to tackle this question.
What I ended up trying was looking at the two points being addressed (the point where the spring is stretched 0.182 meters downwards, and the equilibrium).

Using the conservation of energy, I put the equation:

E total1 = E total2

(Where E total1 is at the point where the spring is stretched, and E total2 is the point at which the spring passes the equilibrium)

I then put:

Ep + Ek + Ee = Ep + Ek + Ee

I canceled out Ep ( because h = 0), and Ek (because v = 0) on the left side of the equation. I canceled out Ee on the left
you mean right[/color]side of the equation because x = 0. The equation became:

Ee = Ep +Ek


So far, am I on the right track, or is what I did completely wrong?
it is completely right
Could this question be done a simplier way using the formula: Fs = -kx ?
This would be a much harder way to solve it, with errors guaranteed!
 
At the point where it is stretched fully all the energy is in the form of potential energy. At the equilibrium point all energy in Kinetic.

Let's start at the equilibrium. Energy is all Kinetic so..
E=(1/2)mv^2
E=(1/2)(0.256)0.746^2
E=.0712

Now since that energy is conserved the energy at the equilibrium point should be the same as at the beginning when it is stretched however it is in the form of potential energy. So...

E=(1/2)Ks*S^2
.0712=(1/2)Ks*(.182)^2
Ks=.0712/[(1/2)(.182)^2]
Ks=4.301

Hope I did that all right. If not hopefully it at least helps you out some.
 
Phew, good to know I'm getting somewhere. Thanks PhanthomJay!
And thank you for your input Kreamer! You just forgot to include elastic potential energy :)
 
I had a feeling I was forgetting something. We just learned about all that recently as well so I don't claim to be an expert ;) glad I could help though!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top