Calculating Force on Peg in Uniform Ladder Against Wall | Quick Statics Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ishida52134
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
AI Thread Summary
A uniform ladder weighing 400 N is positioned at a 30° angle against a frictionless wall, with its lower end secured by a peg. The forces acting on the ladder include the weight, normal force, and the force from the wall, with the peg providing horizontal support. Calculations using torque and moments around the base led to confusion regarding the frictional force, as the peg does not exert friction. The calculated force on the peg was found to be 529 N, which does not match the expected answer of 470 N, suggesting a possible error in the textbook. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly accounting for forces and moments in static equilibrium problems.
Ishida52134
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform ladder is 10m long and weighs 400 N. It rests with its upper end against a frictionless
vertical wall. Its lower end rests on the ground and is prevented from slipping by a peg driven
into the ground. The ladder makes a 30◦ angle with the horizontal. The magnitude of the
force exerted on the peg by the ladder is:

A. zero
B. 200N
C. 400N
D. 470N
E. 670N


Homework Equations


torque = r x F




The Attempt at a Solution


First I identified the forces. So normal force, frictional force, weight, and force from the wall and force from the peg which acts horizantally.
Basically, I just took moments about the base of the ladder. I got -400(5cos30) + 5Fw = 0.
Then I solved for Fw getting 346.
Then I set all x forces equal to each other. Getting 346 = Fpeg + Ffrictional.
And I got stuck lol.

I don't know if there's no frictional force at all and that the peg is acting in place of it or if it's the sum of them together that provides the x component.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
any ideas
 
There is no friction at the peg. So calculate the horizontal force that the peg exerts on the ladder. Don't forget the vertical force also.
 
oh thanks.
But I keep getting 529 as the magnitude which isn't any of the answer choices. And the answer is supposed to be 470N
 
Yeah, that's what I get. looks like a book error to me.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top