Calculating Force Using Young's Modulus

AI Thread Summary
To calculate force using Young's Modulus, the relationship between stress, strain, and the modulus of elasticity is essential. Given the change in length and original length, strain can be determined, which allows for calculating stress by multiplying strain with Young's Modulus. However, both force and cross-sectional area remain unknown, creating a circular dependency in calculations. Without one of these values, it is impossible to derive the other directly. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving problems involving Young's Modulus effectively.
MissAlex
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. How to calculate cross sectional area and force for Young's Modulus? My main issue is that I don't know my F or my Ao. Help?
e=Constant 2.106
DeltaL=10mm
Lo (original length of elastic)= 200mm
f=?
Ao=?


2. E= FLo
Ao(Delta)L
F= EAoDeltaLength[U/]
Lo
F= (2.106)(10mm)(Ao)
200mm


3. There are two unknown variables! How can I do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting. From the given change in length and original length, you can calculate the strain. Then you can multiply with E to obtain the stress. But you can't calculate the area if the force is unknown, and vice versa.
 
Right.
What is the force though? How can force be calculated?
How is cross-sectional area calculated?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top