Calculating Forces on a Skier Pulled Up a Slope

  • Thread starter Thread starter mb85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Slope
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force exerted by the rope on a skier being pulled up a frictionless slope, the correct approach for constant velocity (part a) is to equate the rope's force to the gravitational component acting down the slope, resulting in 87.36 N. The normal force calculation is unnecessary in this scenario since there is no friction. For part b, when the skier accelerates at 0.105 m/s², the net force equation shows that the rope's force must overcome both gravity and provide the necessary acceleration, leading to a calculated force of 93.92 N. The discussion clarifies the importance of understanding the forces acting on the skier and correctly applying Newton's second law. Overall, the calculations emphasize the distinction between forces acting parallel and perpendicular to the slope.
mb85
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Holding onto a tow rope moving parallel to a frictionless ski slope, a 62.5 kg skier is pulled up the slope, which is at an angle of 8.2° with the horizontal. What is the magnitude Frope of the force on the skier from the rope when (a) the magnitude v of the skier's velocity is constant at 2.00 m/s and (b) v = 2.00 m/s as v increases at a rate of 0.105 m/s2?


when trying to figure this out, i used the formula,
T = mg sin (theta)
= (62.5)(9.8)(sin 8.2)
= 87.36N

then Fn = mg cos (theta)
=(62.5)(9.8)(cos 8.2)
= 606.2N

then the magnitude came to = 612.5N

for part B...
I used Fn = m(g+a)
= (62.5)(9.8 + .105)
=619.1N


But both of those answers are incorrect... am i going about this problem the wrong way?? any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part (a): if the skier is moving at a constant velocity, then the force with which the rope pulls him up the slope is equivalent to the force with which gravity pulls him down the slope. This results in zero net force and zero net acceleration (thus, constant velocity). So, what we need to find is the component of the gravitational force that is parallel to the surface of the slope. And that was the first thing you did:
mb85 said:
T = mg sin (theta)
= (62.5)(9.8)(sin 8.2)
= 87.36N

That's completely correct. You found the component of gravity that is pulling the skier down the slope, and you set it equal to the force of the rope. You should have stopped there - 87.36 N is the answer for (a).

Your mistake was in adding mgcos(8.2) <-- that's the formula for normal force, that is, the component of gravity that acts PERPINDICULAR to the surface. You would have used this formula if the surface had any measurement of friction, as the force of friction = Fn * friction constant, then you would have added in that friction force. But in the case of this problem, no friction, so don't worry about normal force.

Part (b) asks for the force of the rope if the skier is accelerating at 0.105 m/s^2. In this case, our forces obviously don't add to simply zero. However, it's not too difficult. Follow this basic idea:
Sum of all forces = m*a
That is, the sum of all of the forces acting upon the skier is equivalent to the mass of the skier * his acceleration (all of these along the surface of the slope).

So, let's find the forces acting upon the skier. The obvious one is gravity acting along the slope, which is as we said in (a), mgsin(8.2). Our only other force acting along the slope is the force of the rope pulling the skier, which is what we want to solve for, so we'll call it F. As we've said, sum of forces = m*a:

F - mgsin(8.2) = ma
F - (62.5 kg)(9.8 \frac{m}{s^2})sin(8.2) = (62.5 kg)(0.105 \frac{m}{s^2})
F = 93.92 N

Keep in mind that we needed to account for direction in this equation. F and a are pointed up the slope so we made them positive, whereas the gravitational force is pointed down the slope so we made it negative.
 
thanks so much. i understand now. =)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top