Calculating friction loss (fluid dynamics)?

AI Thread Summary
The flow from each nozzle in a spraybar system is approximately uniform if the spraybar has a large diameter, as frictional pressure loss is negligible. To calculate the combined friction loss from the nozzles, only the friction loss of one nozzle needs to be determined, since they operate in parallel. The friction loss is consistent across nozzles, meaning that using the total flow rate divided by the number of nozzles will yield the same friction loss per nozzle. Therefore, it is unnecessary to multiply the friction loss of a single nozzle by the number of nozzles. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate fluid dynamics calculations in such systems.
preet
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
Hey all...

My scenario is as follows: I have a pump that provides a certain rate of flow in my system. The pump is connected to a spraybar, a pipe with holes drilled through at evenly spaced intervals. Each of these holes is fitted with a 90 degree nozzle (effectively a miniature 90 degree elbow). Assume that I measure the flow rate by collecting the water discharged by the nozzles into a fixed volume and timing it. Let's say I arrive at a flow of "X" GPM.

a) Is the flow from each nozzle pretty much the same (ie, X/#nozzles GPM)? (assume that the spraybar is connected from both ends and not only from one side, so pressure isn't lost as the water travels along the spraybar)

b) How do I go about finding the combined friction loss from the nozzles? Do I find the friction loss of each nozzle and add them up? Or do I just use the friction loss at one nozzle (I've heard about doing this, but I want to know why).

The friction loss from the nozzle depends on the GPM, so if I use "X" as my GPM, with one nozzle, would the friction loss be equivalent If I used "X/#nozzles" as my GPM and then multiplied the friction loss I obtain by the # of nozzles? Or is everything I'm saying totally wrong?

Would appreciate any input...

Thanks,
Preet
 
Physics news on Phys.org
preet said:
Hey all...

My scenario is as follows: I have a pump that provides a certain rate of flow in my system. The pump is connected to a spraybar, a pipe with holes drilled through at evenly spaced intervals. Each of these holes is fitted with a 90 degree nozzle (effectively a miniature 90 degree elbow). Assume that I measure the flow rate by collecting the water discharged by the nozzles into a fixed volume and timing it. Let's say I arrive at a flow of "X" GPM.

a) Is the flow from each nozzle pretty much the same (ie, X/#nozzles GPM)? (assume that the spraybar is connected from both ends and not only from one side, so pressure isn't lost as the water travels along the spraybar)
If the spray-bar has a large diameter, the frictional pressure loss in the spray bar will be negligible, and the flow rate out the nozzles will be approximately uniform.
b) How do I go about finding the combined friction loss from the nozzles? Do I find the friction loss of each nozzle and add them up? Or do I just use the friction loss at one nozzle (I've heard about doing this, but I want to know why).
The nozzles are in parallel, so all you need to do is find the friction loss for one nozzle (assuming uniform flow).
The friction loss from the nozzle depends on the GPM, so if I use "X" as my GPM, with one nozzle, would the friction loss be equivalent If I used "X/#nozzles" as my GPM and then multiplied the friction loss I obtain by the # of nozzles? Or is everything I'm saying totally wrong?
No. As I said, the nozzles are in parallel, so the all have the same friction loss (pressure drop).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top