Calculating Frictional Work on a Child Sliding Down a Playground Slide

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done by friction as a child slides down a playground slide, start with the energy conservation equation: initial potential energy plus work equals final kinetic energy plus thermal energy. Given that the initial kinetic energy and final potential energy are both zero, the equation simplifies to initial potential energy plus work equals final kinetic energy plus thermal energy. The initial potential energy is 367 J, and the final kinetic energy is 187 J. By assuming that the work done by friction encompasses both the work and thermal energy, the relationship can be established to find the frictional work.
AZhang
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
A 40 kg child climbs a 2.5 m vertical ladder to the top of a playground slide. Starting from rest at the top of the ladder, the child slides down the incline, which makes an angle of 22 degrees with the horizontal ground. Friction is present during the descent and the child reaches the bottom of the slide with a speed of 3 m/s.

Determine the work done by friction as the child comes down the slide.

I know that the P(i) = 367 J and K(f) = 187 J. What should I do next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should come up with a relationship between work and energy, including work lost by friction. From there it's a cinch from what you already have.
 
Well, from our energy conservation equation, P(i) + K(i) + W = P(f) + K(f) + Thermal Energy
In this case, there is no initial kinetic energy or final potential energy, so our equation would be P(i) + W = K(f) + Thermal Energy, work being the friction force. But then there are two unknowns, both the work and the Thermal energy?
 
Assume that friction work and thermal energy go hand in hand, in other words the frictional "work" term encompasses them both.
 
Oh, I get it. Thanks :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top