Calculating Gearbox Torque for Rotating a 500kg Load with a Handwheel Setup

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rajashekar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the torque required to rotate a 500 kg load using a handwheel setup. The initial torque calculation provided is 2800 Nm, based on the formula Torque = force x per. distance x coefficient of friction. However, there are concerns about the appropriateness of the coefficient of friction used and the actual setup depicted in the attached image, which does not clearly represent a handwheel. Further clarification on the setup is suggested to provide more accurate assistance. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise details to ensure correct torque calculations.
Rajashekar
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi team
In my one of the application I have to use the gear box to rotate 500 kg load
I have to use handwheel to rotate
I am using the formula
Torque= force x per. Distance x coefficient of friction
= 500x.7x.8 : 2800 Nm
Is it correct to calculate the torque
I have attached the image for clarity could you please help

Thanks in advance
Regards
Raj
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20160802-WA0005.jpeg
    IMG-20160802-WA0005.jpeg
    33.8 KB · Views: 755
Engineering news on Phys.org
Rajashekar said:
Hi team
In my one of the application I have to use the gear box to rotate 500 kg load
I have to use handwheel to rotate
I am using the formula
Torque= force x per. Distance x coefficient of friction
= 500x.7x.8 : 2800 Nm
Is it correct to calculate the torque
I have attached the image for clarity could you please help

Thanks in advance
Regards
Raj
Your use of coefficient of friction seems incorrect. Moreover you have mentioned that a hand-wheel would be used for rotation but the figure shows something far different from a hand-wheel setup. If you can sketch the actual setup, take a pic of it and post it then it will be easier to answer your question.
 
benny_91 said:
Your use of coefficient of friction seems incorrect. Moreover you have mentioned that a hand-wheel would be used for rotation but the figure shows something far different from a hand-wheel setup. If you can sketch the actual setup, take a pic of it and post it then it will be easier to answer your question.
Hi Benny
Thanks for your reply
I have attached the image for your understanding
The gearbox is mounted to a block
The block has a guide rod and that swivels when gearbox is operated
The gearbox is a double reduction gearbox
 

Attachments

  • P_20160805_092925.jpg
    P_20160805_092925.jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 620
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top