Calculating how to overcome drag

  • Thread starter Thread starter rosie_burk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the drag force and energy required for a model car overcoming air resistance during a journey. The drag force is determined to be proportional to both the cross-sectional area and the velocity of the car. When the cross-sectional area is doubled and the speed is increased to 20 m/s, the drag force increases to 40 N. Consequently, the energy required to overcome this drag over a distance of 1000 m is calculated to be 40,000 joules. The importance of accurately applying the relationship between drag force, area, and velocity is emphasized.
rosie_burk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Studetns examine the aerodynamics of a model car which has a drag force in air of 10 N at 10 m/s.

They wish to estimate what the drag will be for a full scale model, and the energy lost on a given trip. The drag coefficient C remains constant C= 0.6. The cross-sectional area A of the car is increased to 2 times its original area, and the speed is now increased to 20 m/s.
How much work does this car do in overcoming air resistance in a journey of 1000 m. Answer in joule.

Homework Equations



new drag force = (C/0.5) * (area/original area)* original drag force
then Energy to overcome drag = Work = force x distance.

The Attempt at a Solution



(.6*.5)(20/10)(10)=24

24*1000=2400

but answer is 40000
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Drag force is proportional to the cross-sectional area and velocity of the object. Since the drag coefficient remains the same, we can effectively ignore it.
Thus it is clear that when I double cross-sectional area or velocity, the magnitude of the drag force would be doubled as well. When both are doubled simultaneously, the drag force is quadrupled to 40N. The relation between old and new drag force would be:
\frac{F_{1}}{F_{2}} = \frac{A_{1} v_{1}}{A_{2} v_{2}}
The drag coefficient cancels out, so there is no need to include it.
And, 24*1000=2400?? Do take more effort in putting forth your attempt here...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top