Calculating Impact Pressure on a Panel from Vertical Water Flow

  • Thread starter Thread starter shash912
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Surface
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the impact pressure on a panel from a vertical water flow, the discussion centers on a nozzle with a 12.5mm diameter and a flow rate of 100l/min, reaching a panel 3m away. The key formula for force is derived from the volumetric flow rate and the cross-sectional area, considering the density of water and the velocity of the jet. It is noted that a higher flow rate (1.5 liters per second) can maintain a stable jet, while a lower flow rate (0.1 liters per second) may not. The pressure on the panel is determined by the force divided by the impact area, and the distance does affect the pressure calculations. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in deriving formulas and understanding the dynamics of fluid flow.
shash912
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello can some one please help me I am trying to get my head round this.

I have a nozzle of 12.5mm diameter and there is a volume flow rate of 100l/min. water from the outlet reaches a surface that has an area of 640mm x 20mm panel at a distance of 3m. I want to calculate what would be the impact pressure on the surface of the panel... considering the water is from vertically downwards rather than horizontal since there would be a water trajectory.

once i have calculated the impact pressure i would need to simulate this. i have a nozzle of 12.5mm but the volume flow rate is 7l/min. what i want to find out is would the distance be a factor for pressure? or can we calculate pressure at the impact surface for this and adjust the distance such that they are same? we have to keep the volume flow rate constant in both cases.

can some one tell me how can this be done or a clue on how to go about ? cause i am very confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good afternoon shash and welcome to Physics Forums.

I think that a flow of nearly 1.5 litres per second vertically downwards for 3 metres would remain as a tight stream, (called a jet).
Can you confirm this or is this a thought experiment?

However I do not think that about 0.1 litres per second flow would be enough to sustain a stable stream as a jet, particularly from such a large orifice as you have described.

The force of a jet striking a plate at right angles to the flow has an easy formula.


Force = \frac{{density{{(VolumetricFlowRate)}^2}}}{{(CrossectionalArea)}}

I have not accounted for the increase in velocity imparted by accelerating 3m downwards under gravity.

The pressure on the plate will depend upon the diameter of the stream at impact and be the force divided by the impact area.
 
Studiot said:
Good afternoon shash and welcome to Physics Forums.

I think that a flow of nearly 1.5 litres per second vertically downwards for 3 metres would remain as a tight stream, (called a jet).
Can you confirm this or is this a thought experiment?

However I do not think that about 0.1 litres per second flow would be enough to sustain a stable stream as a jet, particularly from such a large orifice as you have described.

The force of a jet striking a plate at right angles to the flow has an easy formula.


Force = \frac{{density{{(VolumetricFlowRate)}^2}}}{{(CrossectionalArea)}}

I have not accounted for the increase in velocity imparted by accelerating 3m downwards under gravity.

The pressure on the plate will depend upon the diameter of the stream at impact and be the force divided by the impact area.
Hello Studiot.

To make things easier I am trying to do a test in accordance with BS EN60529 for IPx6 for the second numberal 6.but the problem is I have a pressure washer with 12.5mm diameter but the the volume flow rate is only 420 liter's/ hour. i.e 7 liter's / min. can you tell me how did u derive the formule for the impact force what you have mentioned above?

Thank you for taking time to reply.

Cheers.
 
volume of water striking plate per second = Xsection area x fluid velocity= av = V (volumetric flow rate)

mass of water striking plate per second = volume x density = ρav

and v = V/a

initial velocity normal to plate = v
final velocity normal to plate = 0
change of velocity = (v - 0) = v

Force = F = rate of change of momentum = mass per second x velocity = (ρ) x (av) x (v)

substitute for av and v

F = ρ (V) (V/a) = ρ V2 / a
 
Thank you. I am not sure how this will work but thanks
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top