Calculating Irradiance from BPW21R Photodiode Current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating irradiance (W/m^2) from the current produced by a BPW21R photodiode in a transimpedance amplifier circuit. Users are questioning whether the sensitivity value in nA/lumen can be converted to A/W for this purpose, given the absence of a direct spectral sensitivity value. A proposed calculation method involves using the sensitivity, lumens per Watt, and the area of the photodiode. Additionally, it is confirmed that the BPW21R is functionally compatible with the BPW21, primarily differing in RoHS compliance. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on the conversion method for accurate irradiance measurement.
pochd
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am using a BPW21R photodiode to measure irradiance instead of a BPW21 photodiode in a pyranometer circuit that could be found in the pdf link below. How should I calculate irradiance(W/m^2) from the current produced in a transimpedance amp circuit if there is no Spectral sensitivity(Ampere/Watt) value given?


Is it ok to use the sensitivity value (nA/lx) given in the optical characteristics to get an A/W value? (0.81) Below is the calculation i used:

Sensitivity x lumens/Watt * Area^-1

9x10-9 [A*m^2/lumen] x 683 [lumens/Watt] x (7.5x10-6)^-1 [m^2]

Pyranometer Circuit Design

http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/9/6/4615/pdf

Photodiode Datasheet

http://www.vishay.com/docs/81519/81519.pdf
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Pochd,

Welcome to PF!

You can contact Vishay, but I am 99.9% certain the "R" simply denotes RoHS compliance, functionally it should be 100% compatible with the BPW21.

Fish
 
Pochd,

Welcome to PF!

You can contact Vishay, but I am 99.9% certain the "R" simply denotes RoHS compliance, functionally it should be 100% compatible with the BPW21.

Fish
 
Any comments on the calculation of irradiance using the nA/lumen value?
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top