Calculating Linear Momentum in Elastic Collision of Two Balls

AI Thread Summary
In this discussion, the focus is on analyzing an elastic collision between two balls with different masses: one ball with a mass of 2m at rest and another with a mass of m that collides with it. The conservation of linear momentum and kinetic energy equations are applied to derive the velocities after the collision. The first equation for momentum leads to a relationship between the initial and final velocities, while the second equation for kinetic energy provides another relationship. By solving these equations, the ratio of linear momentums for both balls can be determined, which is suggested to be -1. The discussion also notes that the collision is initially assumed to be head-on, but adjustments for angle can be made if necessary.
Lorentz
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Two balls hit each other.

One ball with a mass of 2m standing still relative to the earth. The other ball has a mass of 1m and hits the ball of 2m at a certain speed. The collision is elastic.

Could you calculate the proportion of Linear Momentum between both balls after the collision with this information?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
M1 = 2m
M2 = m
v - speed before collision
u - speed after collision

M_1v_1 + M_2v_2 = M_1u_1 + M_2u_2

Cancelling the mass and zero speed we get:

v_2 = 2u_1 + u_2

Second equation:

\frac{1}{2}(M_1v_1^2 + M_2v_2^2) = \frac{1}{2}(M_1u_1^2 + M_2u_2^2)

Cancelling the mass and zero speed we get:

v_2^2 = 2u_1^2 + u_2^2

Two equations with two variables, you can find both u1 and u2 and therefore the ratio of linear momentums of both balls. I think it turns out to be -1...

(By the way, I assumed head-on collision here. If it's not you also need the angle.)
 
Last edited:
Chen said:
(By the way, I assumed head-on collision here. If it's not you also need the angle.)

Thanks!... it's actually not a head-on collision, but I figured out I could manage to fit in the angle myself. If I experience difficulties I'll let you know. :cool:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top