Calculating Luminosity (Easy Atronomy Question)

  • Thread starter Thread starter zoiberg137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Luminosity
AI Thread Summary
Capella, with a diameter ten times that of the Sun and the same temperature, is approximately 100 times more luminous than our star. The discussion revolves around using the formula R=sqrt(L)/Temp squared to calculate luminosity based on radius and temperature. Participants confirm that increasing the radius by a factor of ten results in a luminosity increase by a factor of 100. The method of dimensional analysis is validated as an effective approach for these types of problems. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving similar astronomy questions.
zoiberg137
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Capella is the same temperature as our sun, but about ten times the suns diamter; it must be about_____ times as luminous as our star.

Could someone please tell me how to solve this type of problem??

I am aware of the formula R=sqrt(L)/Temp squared.

But I'm not sure how to apply that here. Inserting my own made up radius of 2 for the sun and 20 for Capella, I come up with the answer being "100 times as luminous". But I fee like I am missing something...

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi zoiberg137! :smile:
zoiberg137 said:
I am aware of the formula R=sqrt(L)/Temp squared.

But I'm not sure how to apply that here. Inserting my own made up radius of 2 for the sun and 20 for Capella, I come up with the answer being "100 times as luminous". But I fee like I am missing something...

no, that's fine :smile:

that's exactly how these "dimensional analysis" questions work …

R2/L is a constant

so if you multiply R by 10, you do multiply L by 100 :wink:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top