MHB Calculating Magnetic Force on a Wire: Unit Vector Notation Explained

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the magnetic force on a wire carrying a current in a magnetic field, the formula F = iL x B is used, where L is the length of the wire and B is the magnetic field vector. For a wire 50.0 cm long with a 0.500 A current in the positive x-direction, L is represented as (0.500 m)hat{i}. The magnetic field is given as B = (3.00 mT)hat{j} + (10.0 mT)hat{k}. The cross product of iL and B yields the magnetic force vector, which can be computed using vector cross product rules. The discussion emphasizes understanding unit vector notation in this context.
CEHooper
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Problem:
A wire 50.0 cm long carries a 0.500 A current in the positive
direction of an x-axis through a magnetic field
→....^...^
B=(3.00mT)j + (10.0mT)k
In unit-vector notation, what is the magnetic force on the wire?

Work (so far):......→...→...→
To start, I have the formula F = iL x B, but I am hung up on how to get this into unit vector notation.

Please help. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi CEHopper,

Since the wire is $0.500\, \rm{m}$ long and the current moves in the positive $x$-direction, $\vec{L} = (0.500\,\rm{m}) \hat{i}$. Since $i = 0.500\, \rm{A}$, then $i\vec{L} = (0.0025\, \rm{A}\cdot \rm{m})\vec{i}$. Take the cross product with $\vec{B} = (0.003\, \rm{T})\hat{j} + (0.010\, \rm{T})\hat{k}$ to obtain $\vec{F}$. To calculate the cross product, use the rules $\vec{a} \times (\vec{b}\times \vec{c}) = \vec{a}\times \vec{b} + \vec{a} \times \vec{c}$, $\hat{i}\times \hat{j} = \hat{k}$, and $\hat{i}\times \hat{k} = \hat{j}$.
 
Thank you!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top